Archive for September, 2007

The Double-Edged YouTube Sword

Events in Ontario’s political world brought the effects of new media on public relations into focus yesterday.

Up front: Once again, this isn’t a political blog – I value my job. So, I’m not going to comment on the specifics of this. You can find the two sides to the story here and here, and the video here (I’m not embedding it for the same reason).

What I find interesting is that one comment by John Tory, caught on camera, completely shifted the focus of his campaign for a time. From being on the offensive, John Tory has been forced onto the defensive, issuing an apology and stating that the video was out of context.

This is a great example of the effect of social media on public figures. This wasn’t an official video, but then again neither was George Allen’s ‘macaca moment‘ (video) down in Virginia, which crippled his campaign (note: I’m not comparing the incidents in terms of content). Regardless, within a few hours this video was up on YouTube and at time of writing has been viewed 430 times.

Everything you say, regardless of the situation, may now end up on record. As a public figure, you’re under the microscope 24/7.

Whether for good or bad, you’re accountable for everything you say. Innocent comments can look inappropriate when taken out of context, and funny asides can come back to haunt you.

YouTube can be an incredible positive force when used well, but remember – it can define you in a negative way, too.

Google – Love Them Or Hate Them?

It’s fashionable nowadays to rant against Google. Bashing Microsoft used to be the in thing, but it’s passé now; all the cool kids are Google-hating.

I’m going to be the uncool kid in the corner saying, “hold on a minute.”

I’ll admit it, Google sets itself up for the abuse. As the Internet leader (for now, anyway), the company is up there on a pedestal for people to take shots at. It dabbles in so many fields that it’s not surprising people feel threatened. As Economist.com says:

Google evokes ambivalent feelings. Some users now keep their photos, blogs, videos, calendars, e-mail, news feeds, maps, contacts, social networks, documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and credit-card information—in short, much of their lives—on Google’s computers. And Google has plans to add medical records, location-aware services and much else. It may even buy radio spectrum in America so that it can offer all these services over wireless-internet connections.

The Economist published another article (on the same day – wonder what Google did to upset them that day?!) entitled “Who’s Afraid of Google?” Apparently, a lot of people are.

Here’s the thing: Google got where it is for a reason.

I remember a few years ago when a colleague recommended this cool little search engine that was way faster than the rest. That’s why I first discovered Google – their product was faster and more useful than anyone else’s.

Google seems to have embodied this idea in everything it’s done since that point.

For me, customer focus is the most obvious difference between Google and Microsoft.

No-one forces people to use Google. There are a tonne of other search engines out there. There are plenty of online mapping programs. The same goes for email.

Microsoft is a different animal. Their software is ubiquitous – it’s on pretty much every computer you see.

What sets Google apart? They figure out what people want and they provide it. People come to them, not the other way around.

For example: Gmail is a hit because Google realized that people want plenty of storage space and they want to be able to send big attachments.

Who’s afraid of Google? Companies that forget their customers. That’s who.