<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Done With Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersection of communications, marketing and social media</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PRobecast #52: &#124; Tech PR Gems</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>PRobecast #52: &#124; Tech PR Gems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>[...] 4. Dealing with negative blog posts and nuking jargon  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4. Dealing with negative blog posts and nuking jargon  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>I like what you have said, it's taken me sometime to understand the same thing gotta make it so anyone can understand.

Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what you have said, it&#8217;s taken me sometime to understand the same thing gotta make it so anyone can understand.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Morris</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I agree with a lot of it. I don't use URL, I use URI - but I use 'address' when talking to non-technical people. I want to consign the phrase 'social graph' to the dustbin - it's stupid and pointless and doesn't describe anything useful that 'social network data' doesn't, but allows a lot of so-called 'social media experts' and so on to prattle on pointlessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with a lot of it. I don&#8217;t use URL, I use URI - but I use &#8216;address&#8217; when talking to non-technical people. I want to consign the phrase &#8217;social graph&#8217; to the dustbin - it&#8217;s stupid and pointless and doesn&#8217;t describe anything useful that &#8217;social network data&#8217; doesn&#8217;t, but allows a lot of so-called &#8217;social media experts&#8217; and so on to prattle on pointlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickMahn.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-02-29</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>RickMahn.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-02-29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-346</guid>
		<description>[...] Clear communications in social media Dave Fleet has a great post on being more clear and approachable to the non-geeks on the topic of social media. There are many ways of communicating concepts and he&#8217;s taking the lead on making it easier to understand. Kudos Dave! (tags: social media dave fleet) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clear communications in social media Dave Fleet has a great post on being more clear and approachable to the non-geeks on the topic of social media. There are many ways of communicating concepts and he&#8217;s taking the lead on making it easier to understand. Kudos Dave! (tags: social media dave fleet) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Microblogging only works when thoughts are clear, concise and coherent. The problem isn't microblogging. The problems are authors inability to cut to the essence of points / data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microblogging only works when thoughts are clear, concise and coherent. The problem isn&#8217;t microblogging. The problems are authors inability to cut to the essence of points / data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>You're my brother from another mother!

That's exactly why I announced that I was no longer "a blogger."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re my brother from another mother!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly why I announced that I was no longer &#8220;a blogger.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike&#8217;s Points - Why Mike&#8217;s Points? I&#8217;m providing &#8220;points,&#8221; comments &#38; links about PR, journalism, social media, branding, marketing &#38; other items of interest. &#187; Other great points . . . .</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike&#8217;s Points - Why Mike&#8217;s Points? I&#8217;m providing &#8220;points,&#8221; comments &#38; links about PR, journalism, social media, branding, marketing &#38; other items of interest. &#187; Other great points . . . .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m Done With Social Media, Dave Fleet/davefleet.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m Done With Social Media, Dave Fleet/davefleet.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Driehorst</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Driehorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I'm late to this post (courtesy of http://twitter.com/zenaweist/statuses/764546249). 

Doesn't it ultimately depend on your audience as to how you communicate?

Why be wordy and say "online tools that let you have two-way conversations" when "social media" will suffice?

If your audience understands social media, say (or  type) it. If it's a broad audience, then why not educate them a bit and say social media, which are "online tools that let you have two-way conversations." 

I'm all for plain language, but the ultimate goal is to communicate clearly and, often, concisely.

And, how you do that depends on your audience.
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I&#8217;m late to this post (courtesy of <a href="http://twitter.com/zenaweist/statuses/764546249" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/zenaweist/statuses/764546249</a>). </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t it ultimately depend on your audience as to how you communicate?</p>
<p>Why be wordy and say &#8220;online tools that let you have two-way conversations&#8221; when &#8220;social media&#8221; will suffice?</p>
<p>If your audience understands social media, say (or  type) it. If it&#8217;s a broad audience, then why not educate them a bit and say social media, which are &#8220;online tools that let you have two-way conversations.&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for plain language, but the ultimate goal is to communicate clearly and, often, concisely.</p>
<p>And, how you do that depends on your audience.<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talking Story with Say Leadership Coaching</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Talking Story with Say Leadership Coaching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Aloha Friday Reading...&lt;/strong&gt;

Here are some things I found interesting this week ~A big Mahalo to the citizen publishers who write for us online! 1. Mozilla Launches New Messaging Project, Looks Beyond E-Mail at the Wired Blog Network[Hat tip to Chris Bailey.] Gave...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Aloha Friday Reading&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Here are some things I found interesting this week ~A big Mahalo to the citizen publishers who write for us online! 1. Mozilla Launches New Messaging Project, Looks Beyond E-Mail at the Wired Blog Network[Hat tip to Chris Bailey.] Gave&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Green</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/02/im-done-with-social-media/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>USERS is my favourite! Why, oh why, do so many smart people still use a label that suggests we're pimping our audience drugs?  Aren't they just PEOPLE like you and me? lol

CONTENT is not far behind...  

"We need more content!" 

What kind? 

"User generated!!!"  

barf...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USERS is my favourite! Why, oh why, do so many smart people still use a label that suggests we&#8217;re pimping our audience drugs?  Aren&#8217;t they just PEOPLE like you and me? lol</p>
<p>CONTENT is not far behind&#8230;  </p>
<p>&#8220;We need more content!&#8221; </p>
<p>What kind? </p>
<p>&#8220;User generated!!!&#8221;  </p>
<p>barf&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
