<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Blog Readership: No Shortcuts. Content.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersection of communications, marketing and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gin</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/comment-page-1/#comment-68064</link>
		<dc:creator>Gin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/#comment-68064</guid>
		<description>I think every blogger attracts a certain type of audience that&#039;s based on the content which could be good and highly popular and in direct competition with other same content.  Other bloggers use semi-journal sites ? (i.e., examinerdotcom) to draw upon a ready made audience which is good for fast rise as a &#039;star&#039; while others, use the traditional methods of obtaining traffic. Just not sure which is the better audience. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think every blogger attracts a certain type of audience that&#8217;s based on the content which could be good and highly popular and in direct competition with other same content.  Other bloggers use semi-journal sites ? (i.e., examinerdotcom) to draw upon a ready made audience which is good for fast rise as a &#8216;star&#8217; while others, use the traditional methods of obtaining traffic. Just not sure which is the better audience. <img src='http://davefleet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vil du bli lest? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/comment-page-1/#comment-16049</link>
		<dc:creator>Vil du bli lest? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/#comment-16049</guid>
		<description>[...] Les mer hos Dave Fleet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Les mer hos Dave Fleet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morghus</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/comment-page-1/#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>Morghus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>Always wondered how to apply tips &amp; tricks like these for a half-interested blogger (like me) that posts inconsistently and with half-assed quality. Where&#039;s the bar that tells you you&#039;re posting quality posts? It&#039;s not necessarily purely quality, so from there on it&#039;s content - quality content at a consistent pace. 

When you achieve a high number of visitors you know you&#039;re starting to get it right? I suppose my personal problem is getting to the point where I&#039;m motivated enough to go through all the necessary motions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always wondered how to apply tips &amp; tricks like these for a half-interested blogger (like me) that posts inconsistently and with half-assed quality. Where&#8217;s the bar that tells you you&#8217;re posting quality posts? It&#8217;s not necessarily purely quality, so from there on it&#8217;s content &#8211; quality content at a consistent pace. </p>
<p>When you achieve a high number of visitors you know you&#8217;re starting to get it right? I suppose my personal problem is getting to the point where I&#8217;m motivated enough to go through all the necessary motions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sådan får din blog flere besøgende! &#171; Start snakken!</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/comment-page-1/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>Sådan får din blog flere besøgende! &#171; Start snakken!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>[...] Brogans blogpost &#8220;Growing your audience - some basics&#8220;. Det næste link var &#8220;Building Blog Readership&#8221; af Dave Fleet, som jeg fik tilsendt som Twitter link fra Thomas Tangen, en kollega i GCI [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brogans blogpost &#8220;Growing your audience &#8211; some basics&#8220;. Det næste link var &#8220;Building Blog Readership&#8221; af Dave Fleet, som jeg fik tilsendt som Twitter link fra Thomas Tangen, en kollega i GCI [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Bilbrough</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/comment-page-1/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Bilbrough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. As Vint Cerf said in The Guardian recently, &quot;Regardless of the medium, there will always be demand for high quality content.&quot; 

Steve Rubel also got it right when he said, &quot;The truth is that standing out in the blogosphere has never been harder for those who don&#039;t blog for a living. This is simply because it requires original thought - something people don&#039;t have the time or patience to do.&quot;

I know that I&#039;d get more visitors to my little corner of the internet if I had more time to to be original and work on the quality of the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. As Vint Cerf said in The Guardian recently, &#8220;Regardless of the medium, there will always be demand for high quality content.&#8221; </p>
<p>Steve Rubel also got it right when he said, &#8220;The truth is that standing out in the blogosphere has never been harder for those who don&#8217;t blog for a living. This is simply because it requires original thought &#8211; something people don&#8217;t have the time or patience to do.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know that I&#8217;d get more visitors to my little corner of the internet if I had more time to to be original and work on the quality of the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vil du bli lest? &#171; GCI Communiques blogg</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/comment-page-1/#comment-2076</link>
		<dc:creator>Vil du bli lest? &#171; GCI Communiques blogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/06/building-blog-readership-no-shortcuts-content/#comment-2076</guid>
		<description>[...] Les mer hos Dave Fleet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Les mer hos Dave Fleet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

