Archive for October, 2008

Yammer – Useful To You?

Yammer logo About a month ago I wrote about Yammer, the "Twitter behind the firewall" service that won the top prize at this year’s TechCrunch50 conference.

At the time I wrote:

I expect Yammer’s success in any particular company to be determined by organizational culture, how it is implemented and whether people actually use it, rather than shortcomings of the service.

Both before and after that post, we’ve been trying-out Yammer at work. Today I and a few of my colleagues exchanged opinions on the service and, unsurprisingly, there were a variety of opinions expressed.

Differing opinions

Some people (myself included) thought that Yammer has the potential, especially in companies where people are geographically distributed, to help groups of coworkers to collaborate more closely without clogging inboxes; essentially functioning as a group instant messenger service.

Other people, meanwhile, felt that Yammer can be distracting and that it duplicates both email and IM.

Broader input

To get a better idea of other peoples’ perspectives, I threw a quick question out on Twitter:

"Interesting conversation at work today – are Yammer/other ‘internal’ microblogging services just replicating email? Do we need them?"

Also unsurprisingly, given the social media types in my Twitter crowd, the conversation that emerged was generally positive about the service:

Eden Spodek: @davefleet I think Yammer etc. makes a lot more sense in a large enterprise than in a small office where email and f2f is just fine.

Shannon Whitley: @EdenSpodek There are a lot of small offices these days where all of workers are virtual (e.g. Automattic). Microsharing perfect there.

Eden Spodek: @swhitley Agreed. I was thinking of offices where people share the same physical space. I should have specified.

Shannon Whitley: @edenspodek I knew what you meant, and I agree with you.

Yammer Team: @davefleet The difference is that you get to choose what messages you receive on Yammer, but not through email. Use the ‘following’ feature.

Jenny Bullough: @davefleet @edenspodek We’re trying out Yammer for short convs btwn Tdot and NYC offices – faster than email and no-one feels out of loop

Daniele Rossi: @davefleet We use it at my work on a small scale and so far it seems not be redundant.

Rob Tyrie: @davefleet by inspection if email could do what twitter does… there would be no twitter… email has it’s uses but it’s not everything.

What do you think?

Personally, right now I’m on the fence. I still think Yammer has potential but, as I said originally and as with any IT solution, that success depends on whether and how people use the service and whether it fits with your organization’s culture.

I’m going to bend my mind to this a bit more over the next day or so… but if you’ve used Yammer, what do you think?

Practical 101s: Google Reader And Persistent Search

As a public relations professional, it is your responsibility to be aware of the coverage your projects are getting. This applies whether you work on the agency side, the corporate side or in government.

One of the easiest ways to keep track of this is through persistent searches.

What is persistent search?

Persistent search allows you to enter a search term once and receive real-time updates whenever there’s a new result for that term, saving you time and ensuring you’re always on the pulse of what’s going on.

You should have persistent searches set for each client for whom you work.

You can set up persistent searches, via Google Alerts, to email you new results, but for today I’m going to focus on using an RSS reader to aggregate your searches in one place.

Your toolkit

This post uses two free tools to accomplish its goal:

For a little more on Google Reader, check out this video from Common Craft:

Four steps to enlightenment

There are four steps to this process:

  1. Set up a free Google account
  2. Search for your terms
  3. Find the RSS feed for your search results and plug it into Google Reader
  4. Organize your results

Step 1: Set up a free Google account

(Note: If you have a different preferred RSS reader then (a) you probably already know everything in this post, and (b) you don’t need the Google account)

If you don’t already have one, it’s easy to sign-up for a Google account:

  1. Go to Google.com (or .ca in Canada)
  2. Click ‘Sign in’ at the top-right of the screen
  3. Click ‘Create an account now’ at the bottom-left of the screen
  4. Fill-in the form on the next screen
  5. Check the email address you provided for the form, and click the link provided in the confirmation email to finalize your account
  6. Once your overall Google account is activated, your Google Reader account is created automatically (along with a host of other free services)

Step 2: Search for your terms

You’re now ready to conduct your searches. We’ll use two different (though related) tools to make sure we capture both mainstream media articles and posts from the blogosphere.

  1. Go to Google News
  2. Enter your search term (if it’s more than one word, enter it in quotes). You’ll likely want to search for client names, but you may also want to consider spokesperson names, executives, brands, specific products, slogans and/or competitors
  3. In a different window or tab, go to Google Blog Search and repeat step 2

Step 3: Find the RSS feed and plug it into Google Reader

Now that you have your search results, you need to find the RSS feeds for them and drop them into Google Reader.

If you want more information on RSS feeds, check out my “What is RSS?” post from a while back.

In both Google News and Google Blog Search, you can find the RSS feed for your search results at the bottom of the left-hand column on the results page.

Google Blog Search - RSS feed position

  1. Click the “RSS” link at the bottom of the left-hand column
  2. Choose “Add to Google Reader” from the two options presented

Step 4: Organize your RSS feeds

You’re almost there (and it really hasn’t been that hard so far, right?)! The last step is to organize your feeds so they don’t get really confusing when you have a few.

If you only have one or two searches to set up, you’re probably ok leaving them unorganized in the short term. From a long-term perspective, though, or if you have more than a few, I strongly advise organizing them.

Fortunately, it’s really easy to organize your results. Google Reader does it by organizing your RSS feeds into ‘folders.’ Personally I have one folder set up for each client (rather than grouping all of my client searches together) – so I have a few searches

  1. Select the feed you want to organize, in the left-hand column of Google Reader
  2. Click the grey drop-down ‘Feed settings…’ box near the top-right of the screen
  3. If you’ve already created the folder into which you want to put the feed, select it from the “Change folders…” list
  4. If you haven’t already created the folder, select “New folder…” from the list and enter the new folder name into the box that appears
  5. If this is a new folder name, you’ll see it appear in Google Reader’s left-hand column

There are a couple of other ways you can (but don’t have to) go about this:

  • If the folder already exists, you can drag feeds into it in the left-hand column
  • You can organize multiple feeds at once by clicking ‘Manage subscriptions’ at the bottom of the left-hand column. There, you can select multiple feeds by checking the boxes at the left of each row, and select the folders for them to go in via the drop-down box at the top of the screen. Note: In this view, “folders” are referred to as “tags.”

Conclusion

That’s it! You now have easily-accessible, real-time search results for your clients. You can check them at any time by going to Google Reader, although I personally prefer to leave it open in my browser all day so I can easily check the latest results regularly.

As you get more comfortable with RSS and searches for your clients, especially if you’re doing work in the social media arena, you may want to branch out into other searches. For more information on how to do this, check out my earlier post on “How to set up a simple online monitoring system.”

Was this helpful for you? What other topics would you like to get a practical introduction to?


This is the first in what I expect to become an ongoing series of ‘practical 101′ posts on public relations and social media topics. For other, similar advice, check out the ‘practical 101′ series. If you’d like to suggest a topic for the series, let me know in the comments!

Practical 101s: What Do You Want to Know?

One of my favourite things about working at Thornley Fallis is the conversations we have about social media, digital marketing and online communications on a daily basis. Not just in our offices (although there are plenty of those too), but also as a group, around the meeting room table. We have them all the time and they help to drive us forward as an organization, to stay on the cutting-edge of PR, and to challenge each other.

I’ve noticed that while those of us who are ‘into’ social media get a lot out of these discussions, people who are still getting up to speed on this stuff can struggle with some of the topics. Let’s be honest, a lot of this stuff may seem abstract if the you don’t understand the basics yet. Fortunately, we have an amazingly supportive culture at work that looks to help those people learn.

It makes me wonder, though, if I’m hitting the needs of this site’s readers

What interests you?

Do you read this site to get down into the details on the latest tools? Do you read it for strategic concepts? Or, perhaps, are you looking for tips on how to get started?

Let me know what interests you, and I’ll try to bear it in mind when I write.

If you’re in the latter camp, I especially want to hear from you. What things in particular do you want to know? Is it how to set up a persistent search? How to use a particular social bookmarking tool? Let me know in the comments.

If there are enough people interested in the "101s," I’ll start a series of "Practical 101" posts that address specific how-to’s in social media/PR.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Government 2.0 Best Practices Wiki

Given my former life in the Ontario government, I was recently thrilled to see a new effort by Mike Kujawski – the Government 2.0 Best Practices Wiki.

As Mike says:

Every workshop or conference I speak at, I am asked the same first question by most public servants: “Who else is doing this in government?”. I want this wiki to have all the answers and to continually grow as new initiatives arise.

If you work in government, in any country, and have examples of social media use within your organization, I strongly encourage you to contribute and to help Mike make this effort succeed.

If you want to reach younger voters, you have to… use the tools they’re using.

The title of this post is a quote. Not from a social media evangelist, but from Peterborough riding NDP campaign communications director Jeff Bergeron.

Canadian political parties are still a little wary of social media tools (the Conservative Party of Canada, in particular, was criticized for the lack of interactivity on its Facebook group, although that seems to have been rectified now). They’re a long way behind the US parties in using these two-way tools to communicate with citizens.

However, as the Peterborough Examiner noted recently, "From blogs, You Tube [sic], to social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter, this federal election is being battled out in the media and increasingly in cyberspace."

The ongoing cynicism is revealed shortly thereafter in the same article, as the local Green Party candidate Emily Berrigan states, "I value reality more than fictitious numbers."

What exactly do you think polls are, Ms. Berrigan? Certified?

She does have a point, to an extent. While there have been successes such as Michael Geist’s Fair Copyright for Canada group, there are many others that have failed to stir up support beyond people simply clicking to sign-up initially.

Untapped Potential

Facebook’s stats say over nine million Canadian residents have a Facebook account. That’s just under a third of Canadians.

We need to remember that these nine million people didn’t sign up to Facebook so that organizations could market to them, so any use of the site as a communications tool needs to be carefully thought-out. However, if you’re looking to start a conversation with Canadians, there are few tactics with this much potential.

You can be sure that less than nine million Canadians watch CBC News each night, or read the Toronto Star (of course, they don’t all go searching for your organization on Facebook, either)

Facebook also offers a wide variety of ways to reach people. Among those to consider (for a more comprehensive list check out Inside Facebook):

  • Facebook groups and pages for building communities (Jason Falls has a great guide to Facebook group and page best practices, which lays out the differences between the two)
  • Facebook applications to add interactivity (if you have something interesting or useful to offer)
  • Facebook polls offer a quick, targeted way to conduct research
  • Facebook advertisements offer one of the most targeted ways available to advertise
  • Facebook events are, I believe, the most-used event-planning application on the Internet

Of course, the effectiveness of Facebook as a communications medium will depend on the demographics you are targeting. If you’re looking towards the 50-plus age group, there may be better approaches (and they are quite likely offline). Bear in mind, though, that the 30-plus demographic is the fastest-growing group on Facebook.

Still, the very fact that a third of Canadians are on this one site shows that, if done in a way that doesn’t alienate people, there is a lot of untapped communications potential on Facebook.

Related articles:

Are You Reading The Top PR Blogs?

I just came across another useful list of the top PR blogs out there, pulled together by Matthew Watson.

The list, culled from the Ad Age Power 150 list, takes all of the blogs with "PR," "publicity" or "public relations" in their title, so my site isn’t on there right now but it still represents a lot of work by Matthew and a good snap-shot of the top blogs that you may want to check out.

Here are the top ten according to the September list:

  1. PR 2.0
  2. PR Squared
  3. A Shel of my Former Self
  4. POP! PR Jots
  5. Pro PR
  6. PR Blogger
  7. Strategic PR
  8. Young PR
  9. PRNewser
  10. A PR Guy’s Musings

Nice work.

ROI: Why Social Media Will Grow

If you haven’t seen this video from Gary Vaynerchuk, well, you need to. Gary eloquently explains why advertising in traditional media is falling and why advertising in social media is growing, and will continue to grow: measurable return on investment.

Layer that on top of the methods for measuring other outcomes in social media, which we’re developing, and you’ll see why social media can be such a powerful addition to your communications and marketing mix.

Thoughts?

Four Questions To Ask Before Suing Bloggers

TechCrunch‘s Michael Arrington wrote recently about a company that has sued TechCrunch "out of spite," laying into the people filing the suit using words like "absurd" and "frivolous" while threatening a countersuit.

Unlike Arrington I’m not a lawyer, so I’m not going to talk about the merits of individual cases. In fact, I’m going to set this particular case aside entirely. Instead, while remembering that every situation is unique, here are some things to think about from a communications perspective before you rush to take legal action against a blogger.

Are you prepared for negative coverage?

The odds are high that are the blogger has done already said something to upset you if you’re considering taking legal action. Be prepared, though, for even more negative coverage if you go ahead and take legal action. If the blogger does go public about the suit, the odds are high that it will get more attention than what they originally said about you. You also run the risk of being seen as the big company bullying "the little guy."

Arrington’s post, for example, has 131 comments and eight trackbacks (meaning eight other people have written about it) just a few hours after posting. Very few bloggers have the readership and reach of TechCrunch, but it serves as a useful reminder.

What’s more, remember that once legal action begins your communications options will likely become more limited, too, as it can be tough to get any communications past the lawyers and out to customers on the topic. Governments suffer greatly from this — once legal action begins, their lawyers effectively shut down any avenues of public communication on that topic. As a result, while governments often win lawsuits, they usually lose in terms of public opinion.

Is it really a problem?

Yes, you should feel that you can defend your intellectual property rights, your brand, your reputation and so on. Before rushing to a knee-jerk response, consider whether this is really a problem.

Does it matter that someone has posted your copyrighted ad on YouTube, or does it mean that a few more people will see your advertising? How many people are really going to see that scathing review of your company or will it be buried on page 100 of Google’s results?

This is where the experience and knowledge of a communications professional can come in. Anyone can run a Google search to see what people are saying about you (ok, our social media monitoring is a touch more complex than that, but moving on…) but you can benefit from a professional with the experience to tell you whether you should ignore issues, respond to them, address them on your own turf, or consider legal action or other approaches.

Will legal action solve the problem?

Will legal action solve your problem?

By this I mean, is this problem deeper than one case? If someone has a genuine issue with your company, might fixing the problem (especially if other people might experience it too) be better than confronting the person complaining or attacking you for it?

Can you work with them rather than against them?

This line of thinking is similar in a way to the previous question: can you reach out to your detractors and work with them to improve your business?

Dell (who I find myself continually citing when it comes to social media) does this well – not only does it respond to both positive and negative online comments, but its IdeaStorm website lets people put forward their own ideas for the community to vote on. The result: negative sentiment online reduced by more than half.

Conclusion

Of course, there’s another side to this coin — I’m not a lawyer, so get advice from them too. Just bear these questions in mind alongside that advice. Remember, while lawyers may think about the particular issue in question, they may not consider the long-term implications for your company’s fragile brand reputation, which you’ve spent years building-up.

What other questions would you consider in situations like this?

Yes, Some Social Media Programs Will Fail

CNET News reports that Gartner analyst Adam Sarner thinks half of social media campaigns will be classified as failures.

News flash: that goes way wider than social media campaigns.

  • Roughly 60 per cent of restaurants fail within three years (Business Week)
  • 50-54 per cent of small Canadian businesses fail within three years (Industry Canada)
  • 70 per cent of public sector IT projects fail (Computer Weekly)

Afraid to measure success?

Measuring rule Stats like those above make it all the more important that we are able to measure and define success. It’s a critical part of increasing the credibility of social media programs (and public relations, too, for that matter). Unfortunately, it’s also a missing piece in many case studies.

Some people skirt around measurement with talk of the ‘secret sauce’ of their programs. Others avoid it altogether. It takes guts to honestly assess the success of your work.

Another news flash: Companies measure the things they care about.

If you don’t measure, how can you prove your value, and how do you expect people to value your work?

It’s not enough to post dozens of blog posts or sign-up a certain number of followers/subscribers/friends/whatever. What does your program accomplish?

Measurement starts at the beginning

This kind of thinking has to start at the outset of the project:

  • Define project objectives that link to business objectives
    • If you’re in an agency, how will your client’s success be measured?
  • Measure where you are now against those objectives
  • Measure and report on your progress
  • Adjust your program based on your reports

Fact: some social media programs will fail.

Most businesses will fail, too. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t start a new one.

PodCamp Toronto 2009 is a Go!

PodCamp Toronto 2009 is now officially scheduled for February 21 and 22, 2009.

What’s PodCamp Toronto?

PodCamp Toronto is an unconference on podcasting and social media.

Unconference? Huh?

An unconference is a free, community-driven event where anyone can sign up to present. Amateurs, pros, newbies and veterans are all welcome!

Where is it?

As with last year, we’re holding the event will occur at the Rogers Communications Centre at Ryerson University.

Last year’s event was a huge success with over 400 registrants and a great turn-out. If you’re at all interested in social media, I strongly encourage you to sign up on the wiki (did I mention it’s free?).

How do I get involved?

Sign up! Register, present, volunteer. PodCamp is as good as you make it.

Who’s organizing it?

I’m happy to once again join Jay Moonah, Tommy Vallier, Sean McGaughey, Rob Lee, Connie Crosby and Eden Spodek on the PodCamp Toronto organizing team.

See you there!