<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Principals Really Do Media Clippings?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davefleet.com/2008/11/should-principals-really-do-media-clippings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/should-principals-really-do-media-clippings/</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersection of communications, marketing and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The long tail of the Internet &#124; Strive Notes</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/should-principals-really-do-media-clippings/comment-page-1/#comment-17338</link>
		<dc:creator>The long tail of the Internet &#124; Strive Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/should-principals-really-do-media-clippings/#comment-17338</guid>
		<description>[...] Should Principals Really Do Media Clippings? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Should Principals Really Do Media Clippings? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Waxman</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/should-principals-really-do-media-clippings/comment-page-1/#comment-16385</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Waxman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/should-principals-really-do-media-clippings/#comment-16385</guid>
		<description>Dave, this is the comment I started yesterday before Talk is Cheap and my email issues.  So here, a day later, is my response (hopefully  more considered).

First thanks for your kind words about Inside PR and for the heads up that you were doing this post.  You raise some very good points.

I completely agree about value for work - so, as you noted, I don&#039;t think we should charge a client full-rates for work that could be done by a more junior person.

That&#039;s where &#039;investing in clients&#039; comes in - something I believe every good agency does. Let&#039;s not kid ourselves, we&#039;re all in the business to make money.  But by making an investment, we demonstrate that we&#039;re partners and not simply vendors.

I believe we covered this on the show, but I also think it&#039;s important for senior practitioners to keep &#039;working out&#039;.  We need to continue to experience work from the perspective of &#039;the way things are&#039; versus &#039;the way things used to be&#039; (in the old days - BP; before Pentium). 

Then, we can help guide junior practitioners and have a more relevant context to understand their ideas and advice. And ultimately provide better value for clients.

We shouldn&#039;t (and can&#039;t) do everything. However taking our turn on the front lines helps us adapt to the changing landscape first-hand (and it is changing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, this is the comment I started yesterday before Talk is Cheap and my email issues.  So here, a day later, is my response (hopefully  more considered).</p>
<p>First thanks for your kind words about Inside PR and for the heads up that you were doing this post.  You raise some very good points.</p>
<p>I completely agree about value for work &#8211; so, as you noted, I don&#8217;t think we should charge a client full-rates for work that could be done by a more junior person.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where &#8216;investing in clients&#8217; comes in &#8211; something I believe every good agency does. Let&#8217;s not kid ourselves, we&#8217;re all in the business to make money.  But by making an investment, we demonstrate that we&#8217;re partners and not simply vendors.</p>
<p>I believe we covered this on the show, but I also think it&#8217;s important for senior practitioners to keep &#8216;working out&#8217;.  We need to continue to experience work from the perspective of &#8216;the way things are&#8217; versus &#8216;the way things used to be&#8217; (in the old days &#8211; BP; before Pentium). </p>
<p>Then, we can help guide junior practitioners and have a more relevant context to understand their ideas and advice. And ultimately provide better value for clients.</p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t (and can&#8217;t) do everything. However taking our turn on the front lines helps us adapt to the changing landscape first-hand (and it is changing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn Chamberlin</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/should-principals-really-do-media-clippings/comment-page-1/#comment-16313</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn Chamberlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/should-principals-really-do-media-clippings/#comment-16313</guid>
		<description>Sometimes, however, the client just wants (and needs) you--the big kahunga, the head banana. You sold the account, you promised top-line thinking and strategy, right? Too many times really critical stuff (yes, press releases that are smart and strategic) are passed down to the junior campers on staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, however, the client just wants (and needs) you&#8211;the big kahunga, the head banana. You sold the account, you promised top-line thinking and strategy, right? Too many times really critical stuff (yes, press releases that are smart and strategic) are passed down to the junior campers on staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

