<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Your Favourite Tool For Monitoring Conversations?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersection of communications, marketing and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominic</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15989</link>
		<dc:creator>dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15989</guid>
		<description>Dave,

I  agree. Sorry if my comment was too &quot;black and white&quot;, just wanted to give an additional perspective.

By the way I really like to post from Jeremy Owyang, dashboard versus GPS (http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/index.php?s=dashboard&amp;sbutt=Go) 

That&#039;s to me what &quot;pure monitoring&quot; should be about.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>I  agree. Sorry if my comment was too &#8220;black and white&#8221;, just wanted to give an additional perspective.</p>
<p>By the way I really like to post from Jeremy Owyang, dashboard versus GPS (<a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/index.php?s=dashboard&#038;sbutt=Go" rel="nofollow">http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/index.php?s=dashboard&#038;sbutt=Go</a>) </p>
<p>That&#8217;s to me what &#8220;pure monitoring&#8221; should be about.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Fleet</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15986</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Fleet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15986</guid>
		<description>Dominic - thanks for your thoughtful input. 

I agree with your approach, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s an and/or situation that forces us to choose between two approaches. 

These are two different processes we&#039;re talking about, and they can work symbiotically if coordinated properly. I&#039;m talking about tools that let you identify conversations and, in some cases, help with an analysis of them. While this post stopped there (because I wanted to explore perspectives on tools), the process doesn&#039;t have to by any means.

Your approach, which is excellent, looks at one case from a marketing standpoint. However, if you look at a case from a communications standpoint and adopt an issues management-focused or customer support-focused mindset, then it&#039;s important to be able to identify where people are talking about your product, company, brand, spokespeople (and so on) so that you can figure out whether/how to reach out and engage with them, and also to gauge trends in conversations. That&#039;s the perspective from which this post comes - it&#039;s not the only way to use social media as a marketing or communications tool, but it is a valid one.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dominic &#8211; thanks for your thoughtful input. </p>
<p>I agree with your approach, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s an and/or situation that forces us to choose between two approaches. </p>
<p>These are two different processes we&#8217;re talking about, and they can work symbiotically if coordinated properly. I&#8217;m talking about tools that let you identify conversations and, in some cases, help with an analysis of them. While this post stopped there (because I wanted to explore perspectives on tools), the process doesn&#8217;t have to by any means.</p>
<p>Your approach, which is excellent, looks at one case from a marketing standpoint. However, if you look at a case from a communications standpoint and adopt an issues management-focused or customer support-focused mindset, then it&#8217;s important to be able to identify where people are talking about your product, company, brand, spokespeople (and so on) so that you can figure out whether/how to reach out and engage with them, and also to gauge trends in conversations. That&#8217;s the perspective from which this post comes &#8211; it&#8217;s not the only way to use social media as a marketing or communications tool, but it is a valid one.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominic</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15985</link>
		<dc:creator>dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15985</guid>
		<description>I see many solutions that focus on counting/ monitoring mention of a brand name or of a product. 

This is, to me, a non-social use of social media and my view is that companies will  get limited benefits with such approach.

The issue is to define a real social marketing strategy and align ressources to reach a specific objective:

- what community do you want to listen to and engage with
- for what objective (mine for customer insights, adress customer satisfaction issues, buzz, promote your brand,  investigate a specific question).
- what ressources can you put on this project, do your teammates already read blogs, participate in conversations, can you make them more &quot;effective at doing it&quot;, can you do this as a team ?
- what is the result you want to get, how do you measure it.

As an example, let&#039;s say you want to build iPod accessories for teenagers. And you want to build an online focus group of teens with ideas about it.

Option 1: you start monitoring everything about iPod and teenagers... dauting task, no keyword will get you there. you&#039;ll end up with untargeted conversations and mostly noise. 

Option 2: 

A- You focus first. you start gathering Blogs, social places where teenagers hang out, and you find out a handfull of blogs, forums that&#039;s exactly what you&#039;re looking for. Btw you&#039;ll learn a lot in the process, and it can be done within days.
B- You extract the footprint of what a &quot;teen place&quot; is , you leverage connections between places (that&#039;s our patented secret sauce) and you cut your slice of relevance. You&#039;ll end up with a few hundreds of places along with their respective influence in THAT community, not overall.

C- Within this slice you look at what people say about iPod. Grab insights. 
Your team starts targeting specific conversations; let&#039;s say about iPod cases. you can buzz, become noticed, trustes ... and  build relations.

D- In our case, you spot 50-100 teens, with some audiance,  and you&#039;re offering them (via Facebook) to participate in the dedign/review of your next product. Your target is 25 people, that&#039;s what you will measure your team against.

E- You can follow up with  buzz or even an advertising campaign, highly targeted that will leverage the community input.

It&#039;s not going to tell you the overall sentiment about the iPod - (It can tell you how influential teens see it so ). 

But it&#039;s giving you much more actionable insights and connections. That&#039;s to me what social marketing is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see many solutions that focus on counting/ monitoring mention of a brand name or of a product. </p>
<p>This is, to me, a non-social use of social media and my view is that companies will  get limited benefits with such approach.</p>
<p>The issue is to define a real social marketing strategy and align ressources to reach a specific objective:</p>
<p>- what community do you want to listen to and engage with<br />
- for what objective (mine for customer insights, adress customer satisfaction issues, buzz, promote your brand,  investigate a specific question).<br />
- what ressources can you put on this project, do your teammates already read blogs, participate in conversations, can you make them more &#8220;effective at doing it&#8221;, can you do this as a team ?<br />
- what is the result you want to get, how do you measure it.</p>
<p>As an example, let&#8217;s say you want to build iPod accessories for teenagers. And you want to build an online focus group of teens with ideas about it.</p>
<p>Option 1: you start monitoring everything about iPod and teenagers&#8230; dauting task, no keyword will get you there. you&#8217;ll end up with untargeted conversations and mostly noise. </p>
<p>Option 2: </p>
<p>A- You focus first. you start gathering Blogs, social places where teenagers hang out, and you find out a handfull of blogs, forums that&#8217;s exactly what you&#8217;re looking for. Btw you&#8217;ll learn a lot in the process, and it can be done within days.<br />
B- You extract the footprint of what a &#8220;teen place&#8221; is , you leverage connections between places (that&#8217;s our patented secret sauce) and you cut your slice of relevance. You&#8217;ll end up with a few hundreds of places along with their respective influence in THAT community, not overall.</p>
<p>C- Within this slice you look at what people say about iPod. Grab insights.<br />
Your team starts targeting specific conversations; let&#8217;s say about iPod cases. you can buzz, become noticed, trustes &#8230; and  build relations.</p>
<p>D- In our case, you spot 50-100 teens, with some audiance,  and you&#8217;re offering them (via Facebook) to participate in the dedign/review of your next product. Your target is 25 people, that&#8217;s what you will measure your team against.</p>
<p>E- You can follow up with  buzz or even an advertising campaign, highly targeted that will leverage the community input.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not going to tell you the overall sentiment about the iPod &#8211; (It can tell you how influential teens see it so ). </p>
<p>But it&#8217;s giving you much more actionable insights and connections. That&#8217;s to me what social marketing is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Carlos</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15861</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15861</guid>
		<description>Dave, what about your run of the mill feed burner? I use Feed Demon and the keyword search feature works like a charm, allowing me to monitor across a number of search engines - technorati, Google News, Google Blogs, Delicious, Flickr, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, what about your run of the mill feed burner? I use Feed Demon and the keyword search feature works like a charm, allowing me to monitor across a number of search engines &#8211; technorati, Google News, Google Blogs, Delicious, Flickr, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A tip you might have missed on vanity search &#124; Dave Made That - New Media Musings by Dave Delaney</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15826</link>
		<dc:creator>A tip you might have missed on vanity search &#124; Dave Made That - New Media Musings by Dave Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15826</guid>
		<description>[...] I won&#8217;t repeat every service Dave has mentioned, you should go to his blog right now to check out his list&#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I won&#8217;t repeat every service Dave has mentioned, you should go to his blog right now to check out his list&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason.eano</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15808</link>
		<dc:creator>jason.eano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15808</guid>
		<description>I think your &#039;back and forth&#039; with david jones above supports the need for human talent at the end of the monitoring system. Given that no product to date monitors every element of the conversation in one space, it takes savvy strategy and creative to properly monitor and utilize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your &#8216;back and forth&#8217; with david jones above supports the need for human talent at the end of the monitoring system. Given that no product to date monitors every element of the conversation in one space, it takes savvy strategy and creative to properly monitor and utilize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Golda</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15720</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Golda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15720</guid>
		<description>@Martin: Actually, BackType monitors all comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Martin: Actually, BackType monitors all comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Edic</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15669</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Edic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15669</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dave,
I have to add that while SM2 is definitely a professional application, there is a fully functional free version available to anyone at http://sm2.techrigy.com . You are limited in the number of results and keyword phrases (1000 and 5) but al the extensive analysis tools are there.
Backtype is a very cool thing but it only monitors comments from people who have registered with the site. We monitor everything in social media (that we can get our hands on!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave,<br />
I have to add that while SM2 is definitely a professional application, there is a fully functional free version available to anyone at <a href="http://sm2.techrigy.com" rel="nofollow">http://sm2.techrigy.com</a> . You are limited in the number of results and keyword phrases (1000 and 5) but al the extensive analysis tools are there.<br />
Backtype is a very cool thing but it only monitors comments from people who have registered with the site. We monitor everything in social media (that we can get our hands on!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Golda</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15614</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Golda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 03:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15614</guid>
		<description>@Dave, @Danny: Thanks! We&#039;re going to continue to expand our coverage to more blogs and social news sites in the near future.

Although we should be using all of these tools, I think that the most value comes from ones that are conversational and near real-time. Summize is at the top of the list -- we&#039;ve found it to be invaluable for support, feedback, etc. Another great tool missing from the list is FriendFeed, which is helpful because it aggregates a lot of the activity from others in addition to the native activity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave, @Danny: Thanks! We&#8217;re going to continue to expand our coverage to more blogs and social news sites in the near future.</p>
<p>Although we should be using all of these tools, I think that the most value comes from ones that are conversational and near real-time. Summize is at the top of the list &#8212; we&#8217;ve found it to be invaluable for support, feedback, etc. Another great tool missing from the list is FriendFeed, which is helpful because it aggregates a lot of the activity from others in addition to the native activity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cari</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-15609</link>
		<dc:creator>Cari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 02:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/2008/11/whats-your-favourite-tool-for-monitoring-conversations/#comment-15609</guid>
		<description>We actually do social media marketing. We are working as an agency right now for small and medium-sized businesses but we will be releasing a consumer version of our software within the next couple months. We monitor, measure, and participate in relevant online conversations for companies that don&#039;t have the time or knowledge to do it themselves. &lt;a href=&quot;http://buzz.io&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Check us out&lt;/a&gt;.

Cari
Buzz.io</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We actually do social media marketing. We are working as an agency right now for small and medium-sized businesses but we will be releasing a consumer version of our software within the next couple months. We monitor, measure, and participate in relevant online conversations for companies that don&#8217;t have the time or knowledge to do it themselves. <a href="http://buzz.io" rel="nofollow">Check us out</a>.</p>
<p>Cari<br />
Buzz.io</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

