<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Communicator&#8217;s Challenge: &#8220;We&#8221; Are Not &#8220;They&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davefleet.com/2009/04/communicators-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davefleet.com/2009/04/communicators-challenge/</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersection of communications, marketing and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridging the Gap Between We and They &#171; Ashley Hall&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2009/04/communicators-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-33466</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridging the Gap Between We and They &#171; Ashley Hall&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/?p=1191#comment-33466</guid>
		<description>[...] these days, this is an important distinction to remember. Dave Fleet blogged about this issue and made some very valid points. &#8220;As new research shows, social media practitioners have a different perception of social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] these days, this is an important distinction to remember. Dave Fleet blogged about this issue and made some very valid points. &#8220;As new research shows, social media practitioners have a different perception of social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy McKittrick</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2009/04/communicators-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-33441</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy McKittrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/?p=1191#comment-33441</guid>
		<description>We all have &quot;rules&quot; or guidelines we try to live by. One of mine is &quot;seek first to understand&quot;. So I couldn&#039;t agree more that listening is the first (and I would add most important) step of social media engagement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all have &#8220;rules&#8221; or guidelines we try to live by. One of mine is &#8220;seek first to understand&#8221;. So I couldn&#8217;t agree more that listening is the first (and I would add most important) step of social media engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy Lukas</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2009/04/communicators-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-33342</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Lukas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/?p=1191#comment-33342</guid>
		<description>From personal experience I know you&#039;re right on the money on this one. I teach seminars on social media to nonprofits and small businesses, and one of the hardest things for me to do is remember that their level of engagement and/or understanding of social media is light years behind mine. 

Online, my networks consist of people who are on my level. Then I go out into the real, 3D world and encounter people who usually have no idea what the hell I&#039;m talking about. It&#039;s frustrating but by tuning into my audience and listening, I am able to better construct my next seminar. I always have my feelers out when I talk to people face-to-face so that I can get a better overall picture of the level that those around me are on. Personally, I don&#039;t do very much online listening of what my audience knows about social media, because as I&#039;ve found -- most of them aren&#039;t very engaged yet. For example, a little less than half of my last audience was on Facebook, but most of their questions indicated that they were clueless on how to use it. Listening online is important, but before we (as educators) tell others to listen online for what&#039;s being said about their company, we need to assess how comfortable they online in general, and take one thing at a time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From personal experience I know you&#8217;re right on the money on this one. I teach seminars on social media to nonprofits and small businesses, and one of the hardest things for me to do is remember that their level of engagement and/or understanding of social media is light years behind mine. </p>
<p>Online, my networks consist of people who are on my level. Then I go out into the real, 3D world and encounter people who usually have no idea what the hell I&#8217;m talking about. It&#8217;s frustrating but by tuning into my audience and listening, I am able to better construct my next seminar. I always have my feelers out when I talk to people face-to-face so that I can get a better overall picture of the level that those around me are on. Personally, I don&#8217;t do very much online listening of what my audience knows about social media, because as I&#8217;ve found &#8212; most of them aren&#8217;t very engaged yet. For example, a little less than half of my last audience was on Facebook, but most of their questions indicated that they were clueless on how to use it. Listening online is important, but before we (as educators) tell others to listen online for what&#8217;s being said about their company, we need to assess how comfortable they online in general, and take one thing at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy MacKinnon</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2009/04/communicators-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-33334</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy MacKinnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/?p=1191#comment-33334</guid>
		<description>Agree. It is all about ROI and efficient communication. Part of that is getting the story right before we tweet/blog/podcast/FB to death.  

And, by &quot;story,&quot; I mean right message for the right person, delivered the right way.  Highest ROI. Throwing stuff to see if it sticks, is throwing money away, and that isn&#039;t going work in this economy for anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree. It is all about ROI and efficient communication. Part of that is getting the story right before we tweet/blog/podcast/FB to death.  </p>
<p>And, by &#8220;story,&#8221; I mean right message for the right person, delivered the right way.  Highest ROI. Throwing stuff to see if it sticks, is throwing money away, and that isn&#8217;t going work in this economy for anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parker</title>
		<link>http://davefleet.com/2009/04/communicators-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-33284</link>
		<dc:creator>Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefleet.com/?p=1191#comment-33284</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty happy to see an attitude shift in the PR Industry away from thinking that every campaign needs a blog/podcast/shiny social media tool and towards questioning if the audience that the PR pro is trying to reach even uses those tools. 

Everyone got excited about social media over the last few years, and now that the excitement is dying off, they are starting to become just another tool for reaching people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty happy to see an attitude shift in the PR Industry away from thinking that every campaign needs a blog/podcast/shiny social media tool and towards questioning if the audience that the PR pro is trying to reach even uses those tools. </p>
<p>Everyone got excited about social media over the last few years, and now that the excitement is dying off, they are starting to become just another tool for reaching people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

