Enough With Misusing Social Media ROI, Already

ROI-graph

I’m a little tired of abusing the term “ROI” – giving it new meanings just so they can say they’re measuring it. “Return on Interaction”… “Return on Engagement”… enough already.

Breaking news: ROI may well not matter for your social media program. (Edit: At least, not as a direct, immediate metric.)

Except this isn’t breaking news – people just don’t seem to hear it.

Here’s a definition of ROI from Wikipedia:

“Return on investment (ROI) [...] is the ratio of money gained or lost (whether realized or unrealized) on an investment relative to the amount of money invested.”

There’s even a formula:

ROI

ROI is a finanical term. It has a set definition, which carries plenty of weight in companies. However, that doesn’t mean you can always relate your programs directly to it.

For the formula to work, you need to know the cost and benefits of your program in dollar amounts. You should know the cost of your investment, but the gain may be hard to attribute (especially to a single factor). What’s the gain from improved customer service? From relationship-building? From increased employee engagement?

Sometimes you CAN identify a specific gain from your investment. Sometimes you can tie specific activity to conversions and have a specific value for those conversions. In those cases, you’re in luck – you’ve hit the communicator’s nirvana. The rest of the time, just accept it:

ROI may not be the right measurement for you.

Does that mean your program isn’t valuable? Does that mean you’ll never get executive sign-off? Does that mean it’s not worth measuring your program?

No.

It means you find appropriate ways to tie measurement back to your objectives. Those last four words are key: “back to your objectives.” Because everything should lead back to them.

As we’ve navigated through this recession, we’ve seen clients become (rightly) more and more focused on measuring outcomes, not outputs. It’s music to my ears, because this gives us the opportunity to (a) measure the heck out of a program and (b) adjust programs to ensure they achieve the right results for the client.

Those measurements don’t have to lead to a financial formula; they just have to tie back to your client’s goals. Do they want to drive sales? Address customer issues? Be perceived as leaders in their market? I could go on and on. Each of these has different end metrics, along with different proxies along the way. They’re all valuable.

So, please – enough with “return on influence” and other variations on the term “ROI.”

The fact that you’re not measuring ROI doesn’t mean you’re not measuring success or impact. In fact, it may just mean you’re measuring the right thing.

What do you think?

Update: Oliver Blanchard made an excellent point that I neglected to include here – Ultimately, all of these measures SHOULD feed back to ROI. If your company isn’t tying its activities back to that eventually, you risk both the cost of an ineffective program and the opportunity cost of missing more effective investment elsewhere. I would add that there may be intermediate steps between your program and the ROI calculation. Making-up new metrics because you can’t tie directly to ROI does nothing to help you.

(Images: Investopedia, Shutterstock)

  • Pingback: Concannon (Lance Concannon)

  • http://www.joeboughner.ca Joe Boughner

    I think this might be a semantic point, Dave. While you’re right to say that return on investment isn’t always possible to evaluate in a strictly financial sense (especially for campaigns with a social media component), the concept of ‘return on investment’ seems to have grown beyond its original definition. It may not be strictly measurable by the formula you cited above but if you can’t sell your higher ups / clients on a viable return on the time, resources and energy they invest, you won’t sell them on the merits of the campaign.

    • prmaven

      You made a point that I think many people forget.  No matter how marketers validate their social media programs (which I think are an important component in any marketing mix), the higher ups always ask for ROI.  No way around it.

  • Martha McLean

    Hi Dave,

    Great points. I tend to agree with Joe above that while the ROI formula continues to play a role as intended in many organizations and business, the concept has grown beyond the proper use, as has the definition.

    For government, it’s results-based management and measurement. As you note, how are your activities tied to objectives (at any level,) have “appropriate” indicators been identified (biggest misstep in my opinion) and do you have the capacity to properly measure.

    Social media in gov’t is being sold as ‘easy’ which makes it all the more important for us to properly measure, or be able to communicate some ‘return.’

    Whether people are calling it a return, a result or a measurement, let’s not dismiss the effort.

    @mjmclean

  • Pingback: mjmclean (Martha McLean)

  • http://www.directmarketingobservations.com Marc Meyer

    I give props to anyone who understands that they have to track back to something. My fear is that someone gets into social without a clearly defined goal that is indeed measurable. I agree it does not have to be ROI by definition. Hell it could be a return on effort, on engagement, influence, etc..Let’s just make sure we are measuring; because if we don’t, then your perception or those above you, will be that it was a complete waste of time.

    Maybe it’s really ROTI- Return on time invested. Jacob Morgan recently wrote about how much time this takes. But the upside is that the results are inversely tied to the amount of time invested..and I agree with that metric.

  • Alex Brasil

    I do see where you’re coming from in that, taken too far, the ROI focus just gets in the way of getting things done, but on the other hand, I think it’s worth focusing on heavily while moving along with ones’ Social Media iniativies.

    Furthermore, while we’re not there yet, the ability to positivley correlate Social Media iniatives with ROI continues to improve. Have you seen the work Radian6 has done with Webtrends yet? Even if you’re not familiar with the Web Analytics space, get them to demo you– it’s enlightening in the sense that you can see the online measurement world coming together, and since different aspects of the online measurement world are obsessed with ROI, the links are largely already there– allowing for the two to be tied together.

    It may never be perfect, but particularly if your online properties sell products or offer support, ROI is increasingly evident via social channels. What’s more, if you do check the demo I mentioned, you can see the immense potential. In effect, you can tell what/whom people were reading when they came to your properties– purchased, converted on another goal etc.

    By using those standards as a base and improving on them via your social media initatives, you should expect to see a positive correlation of some sort on your measurement side.

    Having said all of that– you’re right. There is and will ALWAYS be an element of faith and aspects of Social Media that cannot be strictly related to the financial aspects of an organization. In an ideal world people will take a balanced perspective– prove what you can, celebrate your successes/avoid your prior mistakes, and, in the meantime, understand that just because some iniatives don’t show up on a balance sheet, they can still matter. I just hope that neither side throws the baby out with the bathwater so to speak.

  • http://www.repumetrix.com/blog Joseph Fiore

    IMHO, when we try to apply ROI to social media outcome, we allow a false dichotomy to further perpetuate. At its most basic understanding, if the “thought” is to drive sales and boost revenue, then ROI might only serve to provide a false sense of comfort and ease of mind because we might identify better with formulas and structured approaches to achieving objectives. And while its certainly good reason to choose structure over loose and aimless approaches, the “action” might fall short or be badly misled by our “thoughts” and perceptions on measurable outcomes. Rather than ROI taking on a life of its own in SM, lets focus instead on delivering results and objectives that can be backed-up by action rather than promise that can’t be kept.

    Joseph
    @RepuTrack

  • http://www.davefleet.com Dave Fleet

    Alex, I’m with you.

    I spend large chunks of my day thinking about measurement and how to communicate the results of social media programs. I’m not arguing against that at all. In fact, I’m arguing for a higher standard and more rigor instead of made-up metrics and terms that mean nothing. I’m arguing against the abuse of the term “ROI” when there are many other appropriate measurements available (and yes, I have explored the Radian6/WebTrends integration, which got me quite excited when I first heard about it).

    It may be a semantic point, but if the *professionals* can’t get it right then how can we expect others to?

  • http://twitter.com/steve_dodd Steve Dodd

    Hey Dave, great perspective! The focus needs to be on “Return” as a value defined by the business. What are they trying to accomplish and why? Measurement is key to providing proof of this Return. Is it money, profits, sales, cost reduction, market share, reputation? That depends on the specifics of each individual project and purpose. I believe that the issue stems from so many “Gurus” saying that companies must get involved in Social Media because…….everyone else is and the train is pulling away from the station. Companies are in business to make profits therefore always looking to address that issue. Although projects have intangible benefits, real tangible returns dictate absolute value. The more of these that can be proven, the higher the value of the project.

  • Pingback: georgedearing (George Dearing)

  • Pingback: jeffreyccharles (Jeffrey Charles)

  • http://www.redwirenation.com Erin Bury

    So glad you wrote this post. When we do seminars for entrepreneurs and small business owners on social media one of the questions we hear the most is “how am I supposed to find time to use social media when I need to work on my business?” and we always say using social media IS working on your business. Just because you can’t measure ROI like you can using other marketing methods doesn’t mean it isn’t useful and beneficial for your business.

    Thanks!!

  • http://www.sysomos.com Mark Evans

    Dave,

    One of the challenges in measuring social media ROI is some are easily measurable (e.g. sales, clicks), while other are “soft” (e.g. stronger brand, better customer service).

    Many companies are focused on the former because they need to justify their social media investments given the market is so new. The downside, however, is they tend to ignore or not pay enough attention the “soft” benefits, which can be just as valuable.

    Hopefully, this approach will change over time as more companies become comfortable with what kind of returns social media can produce.

    cheers, Mark

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/fransimon Fran Simon

    It’s simple: Why would you measure “new media” with old methods of measurement? Social media requires measurement with a 21st century lens. Is there another way to define goal attainment?

  • Pingback: BethHarte (Beth Harte)

  • Pingback: je_cunningham (Joel Cunningham)

  • Pingback: TraciGere (Traci Gere)

  • http://alasdairmunn.com Alasdair Munn

    One issue this debate has raised over the last few months is the need for social media strategists and organisational management to gain a common understanding of the terms used and set expectations. Asking what the ROI of putting your pants on in the morning may impress some social media folks but it is going to do nothing towards fostering understanding and buy in from a corporate minded management team.
    Any self respecting and successful business person is going to want a strategist to present a solid business case. Indeed there needs to be movement and effort on both sides to understand each others perspectives, however, more often than not it is the person doing the selling (social media strategist) that needs to convince the person doing the buying. Understanding the business need and perspective has to be the starting point.

  • http://www.michellesullivan.ca Michelle Sullivan

    As much as we might hate the term ROI, and sometimes have difficulty applying it to PR in general and social media in particular, we’re going to have to find a way to address this issue, as it represents a reality that we can’t escape, no matter how hard we’d like to. Basically, because it doesn’t come down to us.

    The challenge is that we are trying to justify investment in social media to companies who have to think in terms of return on investment, in the sense of “if I have to convince upper management or my shareholders that it was wise to invest $X in this campaign, I have to be able to get back to them at the end of the day with a measure of success and a confirmation that it was indeed a worthwhile investment.”

    Social media represents much more than new tools – it represents a new mindset, and things like long tail, niche markets, ‘Free’ models etc. I feel it’ll be awhile before business is ready to invest heavily in a proposal that isn’t particularly measurable.

    Meanwhile, we can do what is possible and continue to explain the new social media context in our dealings with clients.

    Enough with social media ROI already … maybe … but only when the client is ready to listen. At the end of the day, he’s paying the cheques and wants to know that the campaign he’s signed off on and paid for brought in an appropriate return.

    So how are we going to meet this need?

  • Pingback: LewisG (LewisG)

  • Pingback: BethHarte (Beth Harte)

  • Pingback: LewisG (LewisG)

  • Pingback: dirkmshaw (dirk shaw)

  • Pingback: dirkmshaw (dirk shaw)

  • http://www.davefleet.com Dave Fleet

    Michelle – I agree with you to a large extent. Where ROI is an attainable metric, that’s fantastic. In many cases you CAN manage that – if you know what a new customer is worth, for example, you can track traffic, conversions and hence provide an ROI for a given initiative.

    In other cases, however, that’s not attainable, and may not be what the client is looking for. I’ve worked with people where the goal is a number of new customers, or a positive sentiment (with long-term implications re: revenue). Those aren’t measured in dollar figures.

    I’m a measurement addict. I’m not saying that measurement, or even “ROI”, isn’t relevant. I’m saying that people need to recognize when that specific measurement is appropriate, use it properly and that when it’s not relevant to the client’s goals, they need to find another way to measure that IS relevant.

  • Pingback: HeyPeterman (Peter)

  • http://www.point-oh.com Peter I.

    If ROI was the only measurement of value then no one would bother getting health insurance.

  • Pingback: Ashley0206 (Ashley Reppert)

  • http://blogs.dix-eaton.com/measurementpr-spectives Chuck Hemann

    Dave – Agree and disagree with you. Where we agree is that the ROI argument is incredibly overdone when it comes to social media. I find it to be less of an actual problem, and more of an excuse to not figure out where XYZ corp fits into the equation.

    Where we disagree, albeit a minor detail, is the lack of a need for ROI. PR constantly has to justify it’s existence because we aren’t all that great at talking about how communications can contribute to bottom line impact. There is some novelty with SM, so there’s less of a push on that front at the moment. I just don’t want us to end up where PR is now.

    By the way, one point I might also add is that there is a distinct difference between measurement and ROI. We often use the terms interchangeably and they really aren’t the same.

    Anyway, thanks for the thought-provoking post as always!

    @chuckhemann

  • Pingback: BethHarte (Beth Harte)

  • Pingback: je_cunningham (Joel Cunningham)

  • Pingback: je_cunningham (Joel Cunningham)

  • http://www.L5Source.com Jose F Guerra

    ROI is a term that is kicked around and has been abused. I do agree that ROI is difficult to measure and challenging to explain the numbers in certain instance. Social media is probably one of those instances where ROI numbers get thrown around as if they were gospel. I worked for a company early one in my career where every IT dollar proposed, whether expense or capital, was put through the grinder to dissect its impact on our bottom line. What I learned is that for the more fuzzy cases, you really had to dig deep and involve a number of organizations/people to come up with meaningful numbers…and sometimes those numbers were tied to other factors such as brand strategies, expected behavioral changes, etc. In other words, the ROI was not standalone but depended on a number of other factors.
    So IMHO, ROI is difficult to measure in social media but a multidisciplinary approach might tease out some meaningful numbers.

  • http://www.davefleet.com Dave Fleet

    Sigh. I must have been unclear. One more time:

    ROI is important.

    Other forms of measurement are equally important

    ROI isn’t always directly measurable if your program isn’t directly linked to sales.

    Many people are using the ROI term incorrectly.

    Other people are trying to inappropriately crowbar other metrics into a new ‘one kind fits all’ social media metric rather than considering client needs and trying back to their business goals.

    Both need to end.

  • http://blogs.dix-eaton.com/index.php/measurementpr Chuck Hemann

    Dave – my apologies. We actually agree entirely. Perhaps more of our focus should be spent on defining the differences between measurement and ROI – there are plenty!

  • http://www.davefleet.com Dave Fleet

    Chuck – hear hear!

  • Pingback: chuckhemann (chuckhemann)

  • Pingback: thebrandbuilder (Olivier Blanchard)

  • Pingback: thebrandbuilder (Olivier Blanchard)

  • Pingback: HeyPeterman (Peter)

  • Pingback: HeyPeterman (Peter)

  • http://twitter.com/steve_dodd Steve Dodd

    Dave, this is discussion is fantastic! ROI is only a form of measurement and important only if it is important the the user. The key message here, is that Measurement is key. Whatever measurement matters to those who care. I do believe ROI is an important one as it provides the easiest way to calculate tangible business value. But other forms of measurement are needed to get there. I guess what annoys most are those who say “Social Media” cannot be measured (and there are lots of those). IMO that’s where our industry’s “Snake Oil” reputation comes from in the eyes of many corporate executive decision makers.

  • http://kdpaine.blogs.com Katie Paine

    As always, I’m in violent agreement with you :) The only thing I have to add, is that what is tripping many marketing and PR folks up is the word “Media” Traditionally, media has been measured in terms of CPM, earned OTS or AVE or some variation of the “eyeball” metrics. So because we’ve come to call it “social media” people keep trying to evaluate it as if it were “media.” I would argue that social networking is actually a complete change of work flow and process. It’s having the same impact on business as the telephone. I’m sure at some point, someone was demanding to know the ROI of that new fangled purchase from Mr. Graham Bell, but after awhile it was universally understood that companies that used it were more efficient, productive, etc.
    We need to be measuring the improved efficiencies, idea flow, customer satisfaction etc that social media creates, not just the clicks, eyeballs etc that it generates.

  • Pingback: miketrap (Michael Troiano)

  • http://www.freshbooks.com Rayanne Langdon

    I should probably read everyone else’s comments before flapping my big mouth, but I got excited. Hah.

    People ask me how FreshBooks measures the time we spend on Twitter pretty often. And the best answer is often another question: Do you measure the time you spend talking to a client or customer on the phone? What’s the ROI on sending an e-mail to someone?

    We’ve made the decision to use social media as another customer service tool. It’s not hard to see we have a strong brand in many online spaces. It’s also not hard to see without us being there, our brand wouldn’t be as strong as it is.

    Thanks for making the stand to talk about this. Not enough people do.

  • http://blog.holtz.com Shel Holtz

    This is why I try to distinguish between ROI (capital letters denote the official financial meaning) and roi (the generic usage meaning, “What did I get out of what I put into it?”). Most people — even skeptical executives — usually mean the latter. They just want numbers to show the investment paid off, and they call it roi. The best way to show lower-case roi is to demonstrate that your efforts (social media or otherwise) addressed had a positive outcome on an issue that keeps the CEO awake at night.

  • http://radian6.com Warren Sukernek

    Dave,

    As usual, you certainly have stimulated some great discussion! I think the key point has to do with establishing clear and measurable goals that ultimately correlate to business performance. Successful initiatives (both in social media and elsewhere) have this in common.

    Thanks to you and Alex for pointing out the Radian6 integration with Webtrends. Obviously, there is a long way to go in integrating social media with the online measurement/ analytics world, but we are excited about the first steps.

    Warren Sukernek
    Director of Content Marketing
    Radian6
    @warrenss

  • Pingback: chrisbyerly (chrisbyerly)

  • Pingback: chucks84 (Dave Matteson)

  • Pingback: guyma (Guy Martin)