Archive for the ‘micro-blogging’ Category

Present.ly – Internal Microblogging Just Got Better

Present.lyLast September I wrote about Yammer, a Twitter-like “microblogging” service designed for internal use by organizations. At the time I decided I liked it, describing it as “Twitter behind the firewall… and turbocharged.”

Issues with Yammer

We tried Yammer out for a while, and I revisited the tool about a month later on this site to look at different perspectives on Yammer’s pros and cons. Essentially Yammer’s effectiveness seemed to come down to organizational culture – if your culture supported a tool like that then great; otherwise it would fail.

However, we also encountered another problem: Yammer restricts membership in a network by email domain. Our company has two units– the public relations group at Thornley Fallis, and our colleagues on the web/interactive side at 76design. We have different email addresses for each unit, so we couldn’t all be part of the same Yammer network.

We toyed with the idea of building an application in-house, but instead recently chose to try out a different application, Present.ly, for our organization.

As it says on its site, “Present.ly is a simple, private way to keep everyone up-to-date.” Like Yammer, it’s like an up-market Twitter for use within your organization.

My first impressions: very good, but still a little buggy.

As we did with Yammer, let’s take a look at the pros and cons in turn.

Pros

  • Allows membership by invitation, by domain, by access code or open to everyone.
  • Present.ly’s groups feature lets you limit your posts to the people who will find them relevant.
    • For example, we’ve set up a group for each geographic location and one for each division.
  • Desktop, Blackberry, android and iPhone applications, although we haven’t been able to get the Blackberry one to work yet.
  • Neat icons appear next to posts when they include a question (?) or an urgent message (!!!).
  • Mimics most Twitter syntax, and has an easy-to-access syntax guide to help new users.
  • Automatic updating on the Present.ly site; no need to refresh.
  • Ability to turn most email notifications on or off.
  • Ability to integrate posts with Twitter.
  • Allows you to attach files to posts (contrary to Stowe Boyd’s post, you can track files – under the ‘browse’ tab then under ‘files’)
  • Built-in hashtags (now built-in to Twitter, but wasn’t originally) let you track issues or client posts internally. We use it to track IT issues, for example.
  • If you run over the 140 character limit, Present.ly gives you two options instead of cutting you off:
    • You can keep typing and it will simply split your message into two posts.
    • You can ‘attach’ more text to your post.

 

Cons

  • Desktop app has a nasty habit of going into an infinite login window-creating loop if the login window loses focus. The only solution is to reboot. Not cool.
  • Desktop app can be a bit of a memory hog – seems to be a memory leak in there.
  • Several of us have had issues with the desktop app not refreshing automatically.
  • Syntax is a little picky – allows @ replies to be anywhere within posts, but only highlights them as replies if the @[username] is at the beginning of the message.
  • You can’t turn all email notifications off, so when an organization first starts using Present.ly the resulting email deluge is a nightmare.
  • Confusion over groups and following people – if you don’t follow someone but they post to a group you’re in, do you see the post? My feeling: you should. In practice: you don’t. That means you need to follow everyone in your groups.
    • In some cases you may not want to see everything so this could be fine (in large groups where you don’t know everyone, for example). However, the lack of clarity on this is an issue.

Conclusion

I like Yammer, but it has its limitations. Present.ly solves those limitations, but it does come with a few shortcomings of its own. They’re not as deal-breaking as Yammer’s issues for me, though, so Present.ly wins with me.

Once again, our success with this tool is going to come down to whether people use it constructively over time; many people are new to this kind of tool. I co-hosted a lunch and learn session for our Toronto office on the tool last week, and it was good to see the lightbulb go off with some people. Still it’s going to take some adjustment.

In the meantime, we’ve already started to see a few good uses:

  • Tracking IT issues using hashtags
  • Organizing people into common-sense, useful groups
  • Many-to-many conversations within groups
  • Sharing business successes throughout the company

I’m hoping to see this expand to cover more things – client-specific conversations and client groups, company-wide collaboration and more. Time will tell.

Have you used Present.ly? Yammer? Do you have a preference? What do you think of them? Do you think any of them have potential?

Julie HacheUpdate: My colleague Julie Hache has written an excellent & eloquent post over at 76design’s Shift+Control blog with her thoughts on Present.ly. Check it out.

Yammer – Useful To You?

Yammer logo About a month ago I wrote about Yammer, the "Twitter behind the firewall" service that won the top prize at this year’s TechCrunch50 conference.

At the time I wrote:

I expect Yammer’s success in any particular company to be determined by organizational culture, how it is implemented and whether people actually use it, rather than shortcomings of the service.

Both before and after that post, we’ve been trying-out Yammer at work. Today I and a few of my colleagues exchanged opinions on the service and, unsurprisingly, there were a variety of opinions expressed.

Differing opinions

Some people (myself included) thought that Yammer has the potential, especially in companies where people are geographically distributed, to help groups of coworkers to collaborate more closely without clogging inboxes; essentially functioning as a group instant messenger service.

Other people, meanwhile, felt that Yammer can be distracting and that it duplicates both email and IM.

Broader input

To get a better idea of other peoples’ perspectives, I threw a quick question out on Twitter:

"Interesting conversation at work today – are Yammer/other ‘internal’ microblogging services just replicating email? Do we need them?"

Also unsurprisingly, given the social media types in my Twitter crowd, the conversation that emerged was generally positive about the service:

Eden Spodek: @davefleet I think Yammer etc. makes a lot more sense in a large enterprise than in a small office where email and f2f is just fine.

Shannon Whitley: @EdenSpodek There are a lot of small offices these days where all of workers are virtual (e.g. Automattic). Microsharing perfect there.

Eden Spodek: @swhitley Agreed. I was thinking of offices where people share the same physical space. I should have specified.

Shannon Whitley: @edenspodek I knew what you meant, and I agree with you.

Yammer Team: @davefleet The difference is that you get to choose what messages you receive on Yammer, but not through email. Use the ‘following’ feature.

Jenny Bullough: @davefleet @edenspodek We’re trying out Yammer for short convs btwn Tdot and NYC offices – faster than email and no-one feels out of loop

Daniele Rossi: @davefleet We use it at my work on a small scale and so far it seems not be redundant.

Rob Tyrie: @davefleet by inspection if email could do what twitter does… there would be no twitter… email has it’s uses but it’s not everything.

What do you think?

Personally, right now I’m on the fence. I still think Yammer has potential but, as I said originally and as with any IT solution, that success depends on whether and how people use the service and whether it fits with your organization’s culture.

I’m going to bend my mind to this a bit more over the next day or so… but if you’ve used Yammer, what do you think?