Posts Tagged ‘engaging’

Cluetrain Plus 10: People recognize each other as such from the sound of this voice

As part of a project to mark the tenth anniversary of the seminal social media book The Cluetrain Manifesto, Keith McArthur organized a project to have different people blog about each of the 95 theses within the manifesto.

I’m writing about thesis number five. For context, here are the four preceding these:

  1. Markets are conversations. (Christopher Locke)
  2. Markets consist of human beings, not demographic sectors. (Simon Kendrick)
  3. Conversations among human beings sound human. They are conducted in a human voice. (Keith McArthur)
  4. Whether delivering information, opinions, perspectives, dissenting arguments or humorous asides, the human voice is typically open, natural, uncontrived. (Shel Holtz, A Shel of my Former Self)

My topic:

5. People recognize each other as such from the sound of this voice

Listen. Engage. Develop.

These three steps provide a simple way for organizations to dip their toes into social media. Of those, the first – listen – is the easiest, the most risk-free and potentially the most rewarding.

It is listening that provides the learning; that shows organizations the lay of the land; that pushes companies to adapt and that enables them to head in the right direction.

It is listening that enables companies to participate in online conversations, not as faceless, message-driven entities but as people within an organization. By listening to what people are saying and adapting communication accordingly, you become an active listener rather than a passive one. 

Why care?

Because people generally don’t want relationships with companies or organizations. They don’t want to talk to Skittles, or to Ford, or to Garmin. They want to talk to people within those companies. They want to talk to people with a face and with a personality.

Openness is a core part of a company’s social media presence. In fact, you should do a “culture check” on your organization before moving deeper into social media. If you’re planning to do anything misleading, don’t really want to hear disagreement or don’t really want to engage with your customers, then step away before you drag your organization down with an ill-advised initiative.

Company employees, when acting online, can and should remember that they represent their organization at all times. However, there’s a balance to be struck between rigid on-message formality (no-one wants to be messaged) and off-target communication that, at its worst, can damage companies’ reputations.

Most people don’t:

  • Constantly try to sell you thing
  • Talk in bureaucratese
  • Treat other people as a statistic

If you approach these tools through active listening and engaging in a way that puts a personality and perhaps a face on the organization, expect an evolution in the way people respond to you as people identify with those on your side of the fence.

People recognize other people by the sound of their voices. If you sound like a robot, expect to be treated like one.

Avoiding The Dark Side Of Social Media

If you look at social media as a collective group of instruments, the exciting part is that it’s, well, social. The discussion; the interaction; the dialogue is the game changer here.

Unfortunately, all too often the tone of discussion fails to live up to its potential. Just today, the Globe and Mail (re)stated its policy of closing comments on all Middle East stories:

"Past experience has demonstrated that too many people post racist, vulgar, abusive and offensive comments, often encouraging violence against specific individuals or peoples whenever we open comments on such stories."

air_force_web_posting_response_assessmentThe tone of discussion on other newspaper sites often falls to these levels too. Meanwhile, the commentary on sites like YouTube is notoriously vulgar.

Still, constructive and valuable conversations persist throughout the Internet using "social" tools. It’s these that offer the potential for businesses. The question for us as marketers and communications professionals is, how do we encourage and foster these discussions while keeping out the trolls?

Choose your issues carefully. If you write about politics, religion or similar types of topics, you’re going to attract controversy. Does your company need to wade into geo-political issues? In most cases, the chances are it won’t. If you do, be prepared for (sometimes over-)heated commentary.

State and enforce a comment policy. Set the boundaries on your properties and stick to those boundaries.

Establish a process for engaging online. Decide the criteria that will determine whether you engage with a specific post or not. The US Air Force’s process has done the rounds online recently (thanks to Joey deVilla for flagging it). It features a series of questions which determine whether the post in question is one with which you should engage. Devise your own process, or use this one – it’s solid.

Practice what you preach. Be respectful to others, particularly if they disagree with you or vice versa. Remember, disagreement with you isn’t always a personal attack on you. Criticism can be good.

Don’t poke the trolls. Some people are just out to offend or to pick a fight. Don’t let them. Again, criticism is fine; attacks aren’t. Don’t respond to the latter unless you have to.

Know the rules of the game. Old-school marketing tactics are frequently received poorly in social media forums. Know what you’re getting into and know how to navigate the murky, nuanced waters of each venue in which you engage. If you’re not sure, get some professional advice (ahem).

What other tips would you offer?