Yesterday morning, at roughly 10:45am, a gunman opened fire in a subway station in downtown Toronto.
That incident alone was guaranteed to generate news interest; however one newspaper’s coverage caught my interest.
The Globe and Mail newspaper used Cover It Live (which I’ve used in the past) to live-blog its coverage following the shooting, complete with (moderated) user comments. I’ve embedded the coverage below.
This is a short post, as I want to hear your feedback.
My take: this is a great experiment. I tuned-in after a couple of hours, but found it very helpful to see real-time updates as developments broke and more information came to life.
One important point to remember: this coverage is after the fact; note that when this started they’d already updated their breaking news story. In my view, this is simply a different medium for reporting the news, albeit a very modern one.
So, what do you think about this experiment? Take a look at the coverage below.
What’s your take on the way the Globe covered the shooting? Is this kind of reporting effective? What would improve it? Is it, as one person suggested, a privacy issue in your eyes? Does this means of reporting news work for you?
(Thanks to Mathew Ingram for helping me to embed the coverage)
Update: CTV employee and former globeandmail.com staffer Bill Doskoch gives his take here, and Mathew Ingram has also given his thoughts on live-blogging news.
On a whim, I decided to give live-blogging tool 
