Archive for October, 2008

Which Sites Are You Deeply Engaged With?

Last month, Yahoo and ComScore released the results of a joint research project which showed that our of an average of 85 websites that people visit each month, people are really only “deeply engaged” with about 1.5 of them.

Stopwatch The article got me thinking about the sites that I am really engaged with; the sites which I visit almost every day and on which I spend most of my online time.

I’m a little more active online than the ‘average’ person – I can think of five sites with which I consider myself “deeply engaged”:

  1. Google – without doubt, this is one of the sites I use the most. If Google didn’t function properly one day… well, I’d use another search engine… but aside from that I’d be quite put out.
  2. Twitter – whether I’m on the site itself (which I do with increasing frequency as I continue to have problems with Twitter’s API limits) or accessing the service through a desktop or mobile application, I probably use Twitter more frequently than any web service other than Google.
  3. Google Reader – usually the first website I check each day – I do still scan mainstream newspaper sites, but I pull most of my reading material into Google Reader. I spend more time actively using this site than any other.
  4. Facebook – I’m getting back into Facebook as time goes on and I increasingly look to use social media tools to keep in touch with my non-techy friends. Most of them use Facebook so I can still be a geek while staying in touch with them.
  5. Delicious – as with Twitter, I often interact with delicious in irregular ways (usually via the Firefox extension). However, I use it multiple times every day, whether I’m adding to my 1,000+ bookmarks or pulling resources out of them. I use it to track media coverage, to compile my reading lists, to save resources… the list goes on.

Does this resonate with you? Which sites are you really, deeply, engaged with?

(Image credit: Daino_16)

Practical 101s: Getting Started With Twitter

Twitter logo If you’re into social media, you’ve probably heard of Twitter. Twitter is one of the fastest-growing social media tools around right now; in fact the Wall Street Journal just declared that “Twitter Goes Mainstream.”

As the WSJ article says in its lead paragraph, “One of the hottest technologies in Silicon Valley is also one of the simplest.” This 101 will walk you through a couple of simple steps to getting set-up on Twitter and suggest a few guidelines that will help put you on the path to getting the most out of it.

There’s a lot to take in, so I’m dividing this topic into two posts. In this post I’ll walk you through the basics and five “how-to” steps to get started on Twitter. In the next post we’ll take a look at some guidelines for getting the most out of this tool (or, at least, my take on them).

Honey, I shrunk the blog

Twitter’s concept is very simple – it lets you communicate short (140-character) bursts of information to the people that subscribe to your updates. These updates are known as “tweets.” It’s like blogging, only smaller – hence Twitter, and services like it, are known as “micro-blogging” services.

You can also subscribe, or “follow,” other Twitter users yourself. The tweets from people that you follow are aggregated into a stream of updates.

Part of what makes Twitter so accessible is the plethora of ways you can access the service. There are many, many websites and desktop applications you can use, and you can even post to Twitter using instant messaging services or SMS messages. In fact, the options available are so convenient that most users rarely use the main Twitter website.

Here’s a great video by the folks at CommonCraft, putting Twitter into plain english:

How do I get started?

Getting started on Twitter is really easy. There are five main steps:

  1. Set up an account
  2. Enter your profile information so people know who you are
  3. Find your friends
  4. Select a way to post messages
  5. Get posting!

Step 1: Set up an account

This part’s easy.

  • Go to http://twitter.com and click the big green “Get Started – Join!” button.
  • On the resulting screen, enter the username you want, your desired password, your email address and complete the spam checker

Step 2: Enter your profile information

Twitter is, to a large extent, a social network. If you want people to want to connect to you, you’ll need to tell them a little bit about you. Nothing scary; nothing that will compromise yourself; just a little bit so people know who you are.

Log into Twitter, and click on the ‘Settings’ link at the top of your Twitter homepage.

Click the 'Settings' link in Twitter

Your profile on Twitter follows the same principles as the updates you post – short, sharp and to the point. The ‘Account’ tab of the ‘Settings’ section includes a text box that lets you input a 160-character blurb about yourself, along with a link to your website and the city where you live. Again, it doesn’t have to be anything horribly revealing. Here’s my information:

Dave Fleet's Twitter profile

You also have the option of ‘protecting’ your updates if you like. Protecting your updates lets you choose the people who can see what you post – every time someone tries to subscribe to your tweets, you receive a notification that you can approve or decline. There are pros and cons to this:

  • Protecting your updates can feel safer if you’re nervous about other people seeing what you post or if you’ve had problems with online privacy in the past
  • However, it will also limit the number of people who will try to follow you, which can limit the conversations you have – thus reducing Twitter’s potential to an extent.

Note: You can protect or unprotect your tweets at any point, so you can always change your mind later.

The ‘Picture’ tab lets you – you guessed it – upload a picture to your profile. Again, not everyone is comfortable with this and it is optional, but it will again make you more approachable and open up the potential of Twitter a little more if you do upload one.

The last tab to worry about right now is the ‘Devices’ tab. If you want to use your cellphone to post and receive messages, you can set that up here.

Step 3: Find your friends

There are a few simple ways to find people to follow on Twitter:

  1. Search for people you know who are already using Twitter Click the ‘Find People’ link at the top of the screen. You’ll see three tabs:

    Tabs on the 'Find People' screen on Twitter

    The first of these tabs lets you enter your email address(es) and searches your address book to see if anyone has associated any of those addresses with a Twitter account.

  2. Invite your friends to join The second tab lets you enter your friends’ email addresses to invite them to join Twitter.
  3. Search for new people to follow Unfortunately the ‘search’ tab is currently disabled. However, you can mimic this function to an extent by using http://search.twitter.com. Search for the city where you live to find other users who live close to you. Enter your career area to find business peers. Enter your hobbies to find people with shared interests. The list of potential things to search for goes on and on.

Step 4: Select a way to post messages

As I mentioned earlier, one of the great things about Twitter is the variety of ways you can interact with it. You can use the website, you can use another website (I just tried itweet.net, for example), you can use mobile or desktop applications, or you can use SMS.

What to choose?

There are way too many choices for me to outline in this post. Check out Brian Solis’ list of Twitter tools for a comprehensive resource. I’ll just quickly outline three of my favourites here – Twhirl and Tweetdeck.

Twhirl

twhirl

One of the most popular ways of using Twitter is through an application called Twhirl. Twhirl is a desktop application that runs on the Adobe AIR platform, and provides a simple graphical interface that automatically updates with your friends’ latest tweets. If you also have accounts for services like laconi.ca, Friendfeed or seesmic, you can keep tabs on them using Twhirl, too.

The benefit of running a desktop application is that it can sit, minimized, in your system tray and just notify you when someone sends you a message. You can do everything that the website lets you do, all in a re-sizeable, convenient application that notifies you when you receive a message directed to you.

Installing Twhirl is very easy – from the homepage just click the ‘Install Now’ button on the right-hand side of the Twhirl homepage (you will also need to install Adobe AIR if you haven’t done so already). Once the install process is done, just give it your Twitter login credentials and you’re good to go.

Tweetdeck

TweetDeck_128

I’m a big fan of Tweetdeck. Like Twhirl, Tweetdeck is an Adobe AIR application that runs on your desktop.

Tweetdeck’s unique selling point is that it lets you group the people you follow by creating different columns which display each group’s updates. If you interact with a large community on Twitter, this can be very useful.

You can also set up persistent Twitter searches to run within Tweetdeck, which is extremely useful. For example, I have a search set up for every client for whom I work and another one for PodCamp Toronto, which I co-organise.

Installing Tweetdeck is, again, very easy. Just scroll down the Tweetdeck homepage and click the black installation button. Once it’s installed, getting started is as simple as logging-in using your Twitter username.

Twitterific

Twitterific works only on Macs, not Windows-based PCs. However, despite not having a Mac, I do use Twitterific on my iPod Touch. Twitterific is the best way I’ve found so far of interacting with Twitter on the Touch.

There are two versions – a free ad-supported version and a paid ad-free version.

You can download Twitterific from iTunes.

5. Get posting!

You’re all set! There are just a few more things to know before you can get tweeting.

First – how to interact with others.

(The second part of this post will go over some suggested guidelines for doing this – this is simply the how-to)

  1. To post a regular message to all of your subscribers (aka. followers), just type it into the website/application and hit ‘post’/'send.’
  2. To send a message to someone publically, type “@” followed by their username, then the message. So, if I wanted to say hi to me (I’m lonely), I’d type “@davefleet hi there!” These are known as “replies.”
  3. To send a private message to someone (aka. a direct message), type “d” then a space and then their username. So, to send me a direct message you would type “d davefleet That’s a really long blog post on Twitter!” Note: you can only send direct messages to people who you follow, and who follow you. That means you won’t get them out-of-the-blue.

Note: Tweetdeck and Twhirl both have this functionality built-in to them. If you mouse-over someone’s profile picture (next to each tweet) in these applications, you’ll see either two or four icons:

  • Re-tweet (re-post the message that person posted)
  • Reply to that person (publicly)
  • Add this message to your favourites
  • Direct-message that person

Clicking the reply or direct-message buttons won’t send a message immediately; they’ll just populate the input box with the necessary text to send that message, saving you a few seconds.

That’s all for now

There you have it – you’re now ready to start using Twitter.

If you’re nervous about getting started in social media, Twitter is a great place to look. It’s quick to start, easy and flexible to use, helps you get to know other people and doesn’t require the concentrated investment of time that blogging can require. It’s still emerging and still developing, but use it well and you can get a lot of value from it.

More on that in the next post.


This post is part of an ongoing series of ‘practical 101′ posts on public relations and social media topics. For other, similar advice, check out the ‘practical 101′ series. What else would you like to see a practical 101 for? Let me know in the comments!

Social Media Outreach Won’t Work For Everyone

Here’s something to consider: engaging in “the conversation” won’t be right for every organization, at least at first.

Facebook isn’t a panacea for your company. Blogging may not change everyone’s perceptions of you. Twitter could be a light-year away from where you are now and, believe it or not, it may not be where you want to go right now.

Blasphemy!

No, I’m not pulling a complete 180 and saying companies shouldn’t engage using these new tools. I’m saying that companies (and we, as consultants) need to take a long, hard, considered look at their organization before engaging online.

How’s your culture?

Joe Thornley gives a great presentation on the steps companies should go through when engaging in social media. One of the early steps: take a hard look at your culture.

Shouting at people doesn't workIf your organizational culture is resistant to change, activities are rigidly controlled and everything goes through 1001 layers of approval, you’re going to find it very difficult to engage effectively online. If your blog posts will be written in bureaubabble by a committee, don’t bother.

Do you really want a conversation with people? I mean genuinely want to have a conversation; not just pay lip service to it. People can smell a fake from a long way away. If you do want this level of engagement then great. If you don’t, maybe you should just listen and learn.

If you try to leap into a two-way dialogue without this kind of critical analysis, you’re likely to engage in a way that irritates people, and you’ll create another way to piss people off. All you’re likely to succeed in doing is amplifying the voices of your dissatisfied customers.

As Valeria Maltoni wrote earlier this month, “Other customers and prospects now have the opportunity to evaluate whether they’d do business with you on the basis of your behavior.”

The road is bumpy

Head in the sand If you’re going to engage online, you need to work in a culture that is open to feedback from customers. What’s more, where it’s appropriate, you need to be open to making changes based on that.

This isn’t a smooth road, especially if you’ve had your head in the sand about your problems so far. You need to be willing to take your lumps when you get things wrong, along with the praise you’ll receive when you get things right.

People who write negative things about you aren’t necessarily trolls. Yes, trolls are out there, but the odds are high that the people writing about you are also regular customers who passionate enough about what you do (or the need you fill) that they feel the need to write about it.

When you start to think this way, you can start to see trends in the conversations; trends that can lead you to genuine problems in your company.

Be open to feedback, fix those problems and, in time, you’ll be ready to start reaching-out to people.

Remember: you’ve probably spent years ignoring what people are saying online. Another few months of not engaging while you learn and prepare within your organization won’t hurt.

Baby steps

If you’re not ready to engage yet, my advice would likely be (all other things being equal) to listen and learn from what your customers are saying:

  • Who is talking about you?
  • Where are they talking about you?
  • What do they like?
  • What do they hate?

As you go through this process, you can do two things:

  • Flag the problems that people talk about and advocate for their resolution. Is your customer service ineffective? Is the product unreliable or (heaven forbid) unsafe? Become an agent of change within your organization like Frank Eliason from Comcast on Twitter.
  • Begin to compile the case within your organization for engaging effectively.
    • I’m not suggesting you should aim to run amok without any oversight, but you need some level of autonomy and flexibility is necessary. Without any autonomy you’ll find yourself responding to comments, blog posts, Twitter messages etc. days after they were posted, at which point you’ll be (a) mocked and (b) too late to have any influence on the conversation.

</end rant>

Social media isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution to your problems. Don’t listen to anyone who tells you it is.

If your own house isn’t in order or if you try to talk to people in the way you’re used to talking to them, you could be in for a world of hurt.

As Hugh MacLeod tactfully put it:

If you talked to people the way advertising talked to people, they'd punch you in the face.

However, if you use social media tools thoughtfully, appropriately and in the right situations, they can be effective.

Branding Won’t Solve All Your Problems

Seth Godin wrote today about a couple of big companies that have re-branded themselves recently, with some scepticism:

I guess the punchline is: take the time and money and effort you’d put into an expensive logo and put them into creating a product and experience and story that people remember instead.

Man with a megaphoneSad but true: many companies seem to think that by launching a new ad campaign, changing a logo or starting a blog, they can fix all of their problems.

Wrong.

Organizations need to remember that just because they shout something loudly, it doesn’t mean it’s true.

I had a brutal car rental experience recently, waiting hours for a rental car despite having a reservation. Not surprisingly, I was a little upset and my Twitter followers got to hear all about it. The first line of the car rental company’s response to me (after an email to their head office) included their slogan in quotes, right down to an inappropriately-placed period from their trademark.

The company has definitely created a story. It’s not the one they want people to hear, though.

Instead of messaging and bureaubabble (please don’t lead a paragraph with the word "pursuant"), I might have been a little happier if the response had included the words "sorry," "improve" or "won’t happen again." It included none of these.

You can’t brand your way out of a poor product or poor customer service.

Twitter As A Business Continuity Tool?

Twitter logo My ex-colleague Lara Torvi sent me a Government Technology article yesterday entitled “Twitter is a Continuity of Operations Tool, State Agency Discovers.”

The gist of the article is that the Washington State Department of Transportation, alongside using its Twitter account for mundane things like traffic alerts, is using Twitter to ensure continuity of operations in an emergency.

“”In an emergency, people will come to our Web site, [www.wsdot.wa.gov] en masse to the point that it overwhelms our servers — we’ve had that happen during snowstorms and other major weather events,” [spokesperson Lloyd] Brown said. Because the Web site is a popular source of traffic updates, sometimes it can’t handle a sudden spike in page hits, he said. During an emergency, WSDOT is considering the option of posting a “neutered,” bare-bones version of its Web site that contains a Web link to the Twitter feed.”

Government? Twitter…?!

Before I get into any more detail, I have to say it’s great that Washington State is looking at tools like Twitter. So hats-off to them for pushing the boat here.

I’ve never made a secret of the fact that I’m a big fan of Twitter. I’m frustrated beyond belief by ongoing technical and customer service issues, but I’m still a fan of Twitter and its potential. I’m far from a sceptic here.

With all that said (even setting aside the dreadful case study of governors’ offices pumping out news releases, cited at the beginning of the article), I have some concerns about the department’s using Twitter as a business continuity tool.

Twitter is no bastion of reliability

Happily, Twitter seems to have overcome the constant reliability problems that plagued it a few months ago. However, services are still regularly compromised or disabled.

Would you put your business continuity plan for your website in the hands of a site with those problems?

It’s not clear whether Twitter is the only part of the site left up in an emergency situation, or if the state is using it as a way to get quick updates up as a small part of the site. Regardless, I’m not sure you can rely on it… yet… in an emergency.

Twitter has a 140-character limit

A year ago, I advocated using Twitter as an emergency management tool, but alongside other online tools – not replacing them.

Twitter’s 140-character limit makes it unsuitable for communicating effectively as your primary tool in an emergency. Emergency news, information and instructions doesn’t always boil down to 140-character snippets.

Twitter could make a fantastic addition to your emergency communications plan, but it’s an inferior replacement for your other tools.

Twitter has no revenue model… yet

Why should we care that Twitter has no revenue? Because that means it has no cash flow. That means that, eventually, it will run out of money, even given its $15 million cash infusion earlier this year.

Hopefully the time when they run out of money will never come. Still, do you want your business continuity model to rely on a tool that could go under any day?

Why not build your own version?

With the release of the open source Laconica application, it became relatively easy for organizations to produce their own in-house version of Twitter.

The department could, conceivably, solve the reliability, longevity and character limit problems of Twitter by producing their own application.

Of course, that system would suffer from not having the ongoing base of subscribers that the deparment’s Twitter account possesses and, along with it, the ability to reach those subscribers via SMS. However, with just 149 subscribers right now, that’s not a big loss.

Why not keep the other information there?

This one is based on the assumption that the Twitter feed is pretty much the only thing left up when traffic goes through the roof. Without knowing more, I can’t be sure that’s the case, hence this point is last in my list.

Bottom line: There are plenty of other websites out there that maintain their websites in a stripped-down version in case of emergency.

The San Diego Union Tribune, for example, has become a hub for information during Californian wildfires. They keep their site up by stripping the images out when traffic is high.

If the state’s website is reduced to essentially a Twitter feed, that’s a mistake. There’s almost certainly essential information there that you need to have available during an emergency.

Static text takes up very little bandwidth.

Credit for creativity

I’m coming across as pretty harsh right now, because I’m not sure how wise the department’s move is, however pure their motives.

With that said, though, I do applaud their willingness to think creatively, push the staid government approaches to emergency management out of the way and try new ways of keeping their systems going under pressure.

Twitter does have some useful features for this kind of use. The ability to push messages out via SMS (and eventually instant messenger) in an emergency is one example. Its simplicity is another.

As I said earlier, I’m not usually a big sceptic. I like to think that I’m not drunk on the kool aid – that I take a pragmatic approach in assessing these new tools, which results in me dismissing many of them – but I’m definitely open to new things.

In this case, though, I just worry that the department has chosen a risky way of approaching continuity. It just takes one ill-timed series of fail whales to render the whole experiment a failure.

What do you think?

A Quick Public Service Announcement

If you’re reading my site, I expect you already know how to avoid phishing emails. However, just in case you don’t, check out the latest CommonCraft "plain english" video from Lee & Saachi LeFever.

Excellent as always (and the yay/boo is back!).

Forrester’s New Technographics Data – How Do Canadians Measure Up?

Forrester recently released an updated set of data for their very useful technographics profile tool.

What’s a technographics profile?

Forrester’s tool divides consumers into six groups along a “technographics ladder.”

The tool is based on consumers’ social behaviours and on techniques detailed in Josh Bernoff and Charlene Li‘s book Groundswell (which I have not yet read, but plan to shortly).

The six groups are:

What’s the news here?

As Bernoff put it in a post on the new technographics data yesterday:

“…the big news in 2008 is that, not unexpectedly, social technology participation has grown rapidly.”

 

Critically, the proportion of people who are “inactive” is down from 44 per cent to 25 per cent. Just a quarter of US online adults are not engaged in social media in any way. Almost seventy per cent of online Americans now at least read, listen or watch some form of social media.

Enter the Canadians

Interestingly to those of us north of the border, Canadians are now featured, for the first time, in Forrester’s tool. Canadians are generally thought of as web-savvy, with high connectivity (according to the federal government, 73% of all Canadians use the Internet now) and high engagement (Canada is known as a leader in terms of Facebook use, for example).

So, how does Canada measure up against other countries in this new data? You may be surprised – this data is pretty controversial.

Let’s look at the groups one by one.

creators

Creators are the people churning out the content – bloggers; podcasters; artists.

Surprisingly, according to Forrester’s data Canada is far from a leader in the creator category. Just 13 per cent of Canada’s online adults fall into this category, compared to 21 per cent in the US, 40 per cent in China and a whopping 51 per cent in South Korea.

critics

While ‘critics’ don’t necessarily contribute their own content, they do contribute their thoughts and opinions on other peoples’ content. They’re the blog commenters, the podcast callers-in, the wiki editors.

Canada is actually at the bottom of the pile of critics according to this new data. Only Germany is close to being as low.

collectors

Canada fares a little better in terms of collectors – the people who, while they may not contribute directly, actively save, bookmark, tag, vote and otherwise store/arrange online content. Canadians are middle-of-the-road here according to Forrester.

joiners

With Canada’s reputation in the social networking arena (especially with Facebook), you would expect that there would be a lot of joiners here. For the first time so far, this is the case. Canada ranks third in this category, behind only South Korea and Australia.

spectators 

Canadians are once again near the bottom of the pack in terms of people who passively consume online media. Only Germany ranks lower in this data.

inactives

You probably know what to expect by this point: online Canadian consumers sit close to the head of the pack in terms of consumers who are inactive in social media.

Notes of caution

Three things here set-off my “don’t jump to conclusions” alarm:

  1. The survey looks only at online consumers;
  2. We don’t know the methodology;
  3. This flies in the face of other research out there.

Online consumers only

From what I can tell, this data only looks at the breakdown of online consumers. It does not, I believe, consider those people who are not online.

While this makes sense as we’re looking at peoples’ behaviours online, it does not consider the proportion of the total population that these consumers make up. Canada is highly connected, while others may have a much lower percentage of their population online.

For this reason, Canada may be short-changed somewhat in this analysis if you look at the broader populations of each country.

We don’t know the methodology

To be more accurate, I don’t have the $995 needed to buy the complete Forrester report detailing the methodology for this study. That’s not Forrester’s problem – it’s mine – but it sows the seed of doubt in my mind over the methodology behind the study and whether it is consistent with that used in the other countries listed.

What about the other research?

As Ed Lee and Sean Moffitt (among others, I’m sure) have pointed out, there’s a host of other pieces of research out there that suggest Canadians are far more engaged in social media than this data indicates.

Back in June, in fact, Ed highlighted comScore research showing that more than 84 per cent of Canadians are active on social networks and that 89 per cent of Canadians watched online video. These numbers seem a bit extreme on the other side to me, but it goes to show that there are lots of different data sets out there.

These three factors may go some way to explaining the difference between the picture of Canadians painted by this data (below) and what I expected to see.

canada

Furthermore, this is raw data that leaves a lot of room for interpretation.

Personally, I’m taking this new data with a pinch of salt until I have more information.

What’s your take on this?

(Image credit for the first two images: Josh Bernoff. All remaining charts created by me, based on Forrester data.)

Integrated Social Media > Stand-Alone Social Media

Jennifer Leggio wrote a post for ZDNet.com yesterday entitled “Social media consultants: snake oil or value add?” Her conclusion:

“Overall, while there are a lot of consultants selling snake oil, the pushiness of the salesman should not scare companies off of social media completely. It can be a tremendous — and free — resource for branding and customer engagement if used in the right way. It does not need to overtake your business objectives and it does not need to cost a fortune. It does, however, need to be strategic and it needs to be done right.”

I have two comments on this conclusion. On one I agree with Jennifer; on the other I disagree:

  1. Social media is not free
  2. Social media needs to be strategic

1. Social media is not free

I’m not going to hang around on this one for long, especially as this isn’t the focus of the article. However, it is an important point.

Social media tools like Twitter, Facebook, WordPress etc. may be free (not all are). However, the time you invest in using those tools is not and that time investment can be significant. Working in a public relations agency where we bill by the hour, this is clearer to me now than ever before.

2. Social media needs to be strategic

Banging head against a wall As Jennifer states:

“Many of these consultants have been successful building their own personal brand, however, prowess for personal brand building does not prove an understanding of enterprise business needs.”

I completely agree. There are way too many people out there right now who have built considerable profile for themselves and think this translates to companies. Granted, some of them do have the knowledge to make the leap. Unfortunately for most, though, personal branding is not the same as corporate communications or marketing. I keep seeing proof that show they simply don’t know that.

In fact, I’ll go one step further.

If anyone who approaches you and offers to implement social media tools in your organization without integrating them with your marketing and corporate communications strategies, chase them away with a pitchfork.

“Companies need to stop believing the hype that social media is an “everything drug.” It’s not.”

Social media shouldn’t be a strategy on its own. While you may need guidelines and policies to effectively use these tools, from a communications perspective social media is a new set of tools that we should add to our toolkits.

If your communications strategy results in you primarily using social media tools then fine. However, just as you wouldn’t trust a builder who just showed up with a hammer instead of his toolkit, don’t trust “social media consultants” who push stand-alone tactics independent of strategies. Believe it or not, social media outreach won’t work for every company (more on that in an upcoming post).

In the long term, the successful companies consulting on social media will be those that integrate it strategically with communications and marketing.

Stand-alone just doesn’t cut it.

Practical 101s: Social Bookmarking With Delicious

As people move more and more of their lives online, it gets harder and harder to stay organized.

Where was that great article you read the other day? What was that great blog you read? What was the name of that cool tool you found?

Of course, you could save everything in your browser’s favourites but, let’s face it, that would get unmanageable very quickly.

That’s where Delicious comes in.

Delicious?

Delicious describes itself as, “a social bookmarking service that allows you to tag, save, manage and share Web pages all in one place.”

Social bookmarking?

If you need a quick primer on social bookmarking, here’s a great (and quick) video that describes social bookmarking in… well… plain english.

Why delicious?

Delicious lets you:

  1. Save an unlimited number of sites
  2. Categorize the sites you save, using as many categories for each site as you want (so I might save this site under ‘public_relations,” “communications,” “marketing,” “social_media,” “blog” and so on)
  3. Integrate Delicious buttons into your web browser to make using Delicious easy
  4. Subscribe to other users’ bookmarks (don’t worry, you can save bookmarks privately if you want to) to add to your reading list
  5. Create your own customized search engine containing pages you find useful

Getting started

Getting started on Delicious is very, very easy. There are three steps to signing-up and saving your bookmarks:

  1. Sign up for a Delicious account
  2. (Optional) Install the browser extension
  3. Save away!

Step 1: Sign up for a Delicious account

To get started on Delicious, head over to https://secure.delicious.com/register. There are two parts to the registration:

  1. Complete your details
  2. Import your existing bookmarks

Personally, I always skip the second step (which you can do via a link at the top-right of the screen).

Step 2: (Optional) Install the browser extension

You don’t have to do this, but it really is the easiest and most convenient way to use Delicious.

Head over to the Delicious Tools page. You have three options, depending on your browser:

  1. Firefox Bookmarks add-on
  2. Internet Explorer buttons
  3. Bookmarklet buttons for any browser

The first two are far more powerful than the third, so if you’re a Firefox or IE user I recommend those. Make your choice and follow the on-screen instructions.

Step 3: Save away!

Not exactly difficult so far, was it? It doesn’t get any harder, either.

To begin saving bookmarks, find a page you want to save then:

  • If you installed the Firefox or IE add-ons or the bookmarklet buttons, click the “Tag” or “Bookmark on Delicious” button in your browser toolbar
    • Enter your notes for the page in the pop-up box
      • Tip: If you highlight text on the page before clicking “Tag” it will automatically put this text in the ‘Notes’ box for you
    • Enter as many tags as you like
      • Consistency is good with this so you can file similar sites together (I have 175 tags for over 1,100 bookmarks)
      • Tip: Tag sites with as many aspects of the content as possible. Remember, a year down the road you may not remember you ever went to that site. Filing it in as many common-sense places as possible increases the likelihood you’ll be able to find that content again when you need it
    • If you want to keep this bookmark private, check the “do not share” box
    • Click ‘Save’
  • If you chose not to install the add-ons or buttons, copy the address of the page and go to http://delicious.com/save
    • Paste the address in the box, click “Next” and complete the “Notes” and “Tags” fields
      • Tip: Save your bookmark using a new browser window or tab. You will likely want to refer back to the page you’re saving when you complete the “Notes” field
    • Click ‘Save’

Conclusion

Delicious really is an easy site to use, and it can be extremely useful. As I mentioned earlier, I currently have just over 1,100 bookmarks saved, and I refer back to them almost every day.

For some more advanced tips and techniques for Delicious, check out an earlier post of mine on six ways to make life easier with Delicious.


This post is part of an ongoing series of ‘practical 101′ posts on public relations and social media topics. For other, similar advice, check out the ‘practical 101′ series. If you’d like to suggest a topic for the series, let me know in the comments!

Capturing Canada’s Social Media Case Studies

Web 2.0 Examples in Canada wiki Dave Jones, the man behind the PR Works blog, the Shill podcast and (when he remembers) the Inside PR podcast, has created a new Web 2.0 Examples in Canada wiki to capture Canadian social media case studies.

The new wiki perfectly fills a gap in the social media space that has existed for a while now, and which I’ve noted previously – the need for good examples of social media use that we can use to show that this stuff really works.

Though I haven’t contributed (yet), I’ve signed up and plan to add some examples in the near future. You should too.

Nice work, Mr. Blognosaurus.