Archive for December, 2009

Book Review: Social Media Marketing For Dummies

A few weeks ago, I received a request to review Social Media Marketing For Dummies (affiliate link) from a publicist at publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc. To be honest I was dubious about the book, but name of the author – Shiv Singh, Vice President and Global Social Media Lead at Razorfish – caught my eye, so I agreed to take a look.

Social Media Marketing For DummiesBottom line up front: I was pleasantly surprised. How surprised? Well, my copy is now dog-eared and I made plenty of notes as I went through – something I didn’t expect to do.

The Good

  • Excellent overview: Singh presents an excellent overview of influencer theory, key social media trends and integrating social media marketing (or social influencer marketing, as Singh repeatedly calls it) into the marketing funnel.
  • Strong on integration: One of my sticking points in general is the integration of traditional and new media tactics. Throughout, Singh goes to pains to hammer on the importance of integrating the various marketing disciplines to ensure success. His points around integrating social media into the corporate website ring especially true to me.
  • Good principles: Social Media Marketing For Dummies outlines four “rules for the game”:
    • Be authentic
    • Operate on a quid pro quo basis – give back to customers
    • Give participants equal status
    • Let go of the campaign – participants will control much of your program
  • Simple, practical tips: One of the hallmarks of the “For Dummies” series, Singh’s text is chock full of useful pointers.
  • Pragmatic on measurement: While the section on measurement itself is brief and somewhat vague (but hey, there are entire books on measurement so what do you expect), I enjoyed Singh’s perspective – that while measuring social media itself is pretty easy, tying it to business objectives can be the real challenge. Still, there are plenty of general tips and pointers to useful tools.
  • Well targeted: While I’ve mentioned the entry-level targeting of some books as a negative in previous reviews, it’s largely because I had expected them to be slightly more advanced. When it comes to a “For Dummies” book you should know what you’re getting, and in this case you do. One note, however: while the book does cover social media marketing from several perspectives, it is primarily written from an advertising perspective.
  • Easy to read: From start to finish, Social Media Marketing For Dummies is an easy read. Written in plain language and well structured, it’s a book you can speed through from start to finish, or consume in easy-to-digest sections depending on your need.

The Not So Good

  • Already out-of-date in parts: One of the problems with providing such specific tips is that some will become out-of-date quickly. The YouTube tips, for example, state that videos on the site are limited to five minutes in length and 100Mb in size, whereas the limit was raised from 1Gb to 2Gb this July.
  • Occasionally weak case studies: People familiar with the social media scene may be puzzled by some of the choices for case studies. The much maligned Skittles website, for example, is cited as a good example of a brand engaging in social media, while other examples are declared successes with little supporting rationale.
  • Weak on public relations: While Singh does tip his hat to the public relations profession (with some complimentary words), the section on PR is brief, with no discussion of the potential for PR to play a leading role when it comes to social media.

The Takeaways

Singh leads the reader through a simple, logical flow:

  1. Getting social with your marketing – big-picture basics including fundamentals in influence marketing, the marketing funnel and social media principles.
  2. Practicing SIM in the social web – preparatory steps such as developing your firm’s social media voice, identifying influencers and reaching people through the major social networks.
  3. Old marketing is new again with SIM – how to work traditional marketing tactics, including your web presence, advertising, mobile and employee communications, into your social media efforts

The book is well summarized by one of the last chapters, which outlines ten best practices to follow in social media:

  1. Open up your brand to your consumers, and let them evolve it
  2. Develop a [social media] voice without silencing other voices that support your brand
  3. Respond to everything, even if it means you’re up all night
  4. Think beyond the obvious and use [social media] to evolve your business
  5. Focus not just on social media but on social influencers
  6. Structure your marketing department for this social world
  7. Take your organization with you, from the CEO to the field representative
  8. Conduct many small tests frequently and build on each one
  9. Capture every single piece of data that you can
  10. Make mistakes, but make every effort to correct them as well

Conclusion

As I mentioned earlier, I was very surprised by Social Media Marketing For Dummies. While this book has its flaws – an overly strong focus on advertising and weak case studies among them – and it’s clearly focused on an entry level, I still found it to be a rewarding read. I took way more away from reading the book than I expected – especially when it came to marketing-focused online tools. I would recommend Social Media Marketing For Dummies to any marketers who are new to the space and looking for practical tips rather than the theoretical overview provided by most other books.

Are Spammers Getting Smarter?

If your blog gets any remotely significant amount of traffic, you’ve probably experienced problems with comment spam. Right now, I have just over 2,100 comments in my spam queue thanks to the Akismet WordPress plugin.

SpamYou might think that with that many comments caught in my spam filter, the software was doing a good job. However, it appears the spammers are getting more creative in their attempts to get around the protection and I’ve noticed more spam comments getting through the filter and into my moderation queue in recent months.

Here are a few of the spam comments (sans links) I’ve found recently:

  • “Aw, this was a really quality post. In theory I’d like to write like this too – taking time and real effort to make a good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and never seem to get something done.”
  • “I normally do not leave comments but I recently started using twitter and I am a little lost. Thanks for clearing some stuff for me. Looking forward to your next post.” (the URL submitted with the comment gave this one away)
  • “@Madeline, you appear to know what you are talking about. Do you care sending me your e-mail? I would like to talk more with you.”
  • “Sometimes it’s really that simple, isn’t it? I feel a little stupid for not thinking of this myself/earlier, though.”
  • “I know this is really boring and you are skipping to the next comment, but I just wanted to throw you a big thanks – you cleared up some things for me!” (the give-away with this one was the same identical comment left multiple times)
  • “Hello, I thought I would post and let you know your web site layout is really messed up on the Firefox browser. Seems to work OK on Internet Explorer however. Anyways keep up the good work.”

A couple of characteristics of some of these examples:

  1. Referring to specific usernames
  2. Mentioning tools which (through pure chance perhaps) relate to the post
  3. Self-deprecating comments
  4. Compliments towards the author

Of course, there’s still a massive volume of generic drug-focused spam comments and gibberish in there too. Still, these comments caught my eye.

Is it me or are spammers getting smarter?

Top 10 DaveFleet.com Posts Of 2009

2009 has been quite the year for this site. Traffic rose by more than 140 per cent from 2008, and RSS subscriptions rose by more than 225 per cent. Those stats mean little on their own; however the effect was to enable some fascinating conversations to take place here over the last twelve months.

Here are the top ten posts on this site over the last year, according to PostRank (which generates an “engagement score” by analyzing the type and frequency of audience interaction with your content).

10. Enough with Misusing Social Media ROI, Already

I’m a little tired of abusing the term “ROI” – giving it new meanings just so they can say they’re measuring it. “Return on Interaction”… “Return on Engagement”… enough already.

ROI is a finanical term. It has a set definition, which carries plenty of weight in companies. However, that doesn’t mean you can always relate your programs directly to it.

9. 14 Key Skills & Attributes For New Public Relations Professionals

Public relations has changed significantly over the last few years. Even if you don’t buy into the idea that online communities and relationships are part of the public relations function, it’s hard to deny the rising importance of blogs, the gradual decline of traditional media and the impact that online conversations can have on brands.

If you do believe that public relations should include these new activities, then there’s a whole new board game to be played. This post outlines 14 skills and attributes a new PR professional needs in today’s market.

8. The Bigger Picture On Public Relations

Seth Godin wrote a post in September entitled “The difference between PR and publicity,” saying:

“Publicity is the act of getting ink. Publicity is getting unpaid media to pay attention, write you up, point to you, run a picture, make a commotion. Sometimes publicity is helpful, and good publicity is always good for your ego.

But it’s not PR.”

This encompassed an ongoing theme for me – a broad misunderstanding of what public relations is all about, both by people within and outside the industry.

This post outlines a whole bunch of other aspects to PR beyond publicity, about which most people aren’t aware.

7. 25 Questions To Make Your Social Media Workflow Work For You

So you’ve pulled together a social media team, you’ve set your objectives, you’ve developed an integrated communications strategy that combines online and offline communications, and you’ve won the buy-in you need to start to engage online.

This post outlines 25 questions to help you develop a social media workflow process that works for your organization.

6. 40 PR-Related People To Follow On Twitter (and YOUR 40 Top People To Follow on Twitter)

My suggestions for 40 PR-related people I recommend you engage with on Twitter (interesting discussions guaranteed), followed by the suggestions of readers of this site. Funny how those two lists have merged for me over the last year.

5. When Can We Start To Say “Expert?”

Back in September, I mused publicly about whether the time had come for people to start referring to themselves as “professionals” or “experts” without criticism (seven months had passed since I wrote post #5 above). Ultimately I decided that no, we’re not there yet. Still, plenty of people offered their opinions.

4. Guy Kawasaki Discloses Ghost Writers, Defuses Issue

Ethics in general were a key theme of social media conversations in 2009. When I spotted a post suggesting one of the biggest names in social media has other people write under his name, I paid attention.

I was very impressed that Kawasaki responded to my email to him on the issue, and promptly disclosed the writers in his Twitter bio (that disclosure has since been removed). To me, that defused the issue at the time. Still, it prompted a vibrant and heated discussion.

3. Why Ghost Blogging Is Wrong

The ghost blogging topic rears its head again. In this post I explained why I think ghost blogging is wrong, and offered some alternatives to the practice. I also asked others what they thought. Ultimately, 78 per cent of people said they thought that undisclosed ghost blogging was not acceptable.

2. Five Levels Of Social Media Responses

You’ve leapt onto the social media bandwagon. You’ve dived headfirst into the murky waters of Twitter. You’ve used a few other cliched sayings along the way, too. Suffice it to say, you’re monitoring what people are saying about you and you’re starting to respond to them.

This post outlines five levels of approach to listening and responding to online conversations.

1. 8 Questions to Ask Your “Social Media Expert”

This post was a reaction to the growing problem of self-proclaimed “social media experts.” It gives eight questions which might help to filter the wheat from the chaff.

Amusingly, this post is currently the number one result for “social media expert” on google.ca and the number three result on google.com. Oops… :)

(Image source: Shutterstock)

Where’s The Line With Location-Based Apps and Privacy?

tin-foil-hat.jpgLoic Le Meur wrote yesterday about My Tracks – an application for Android phones which uses your phone’s GPS chip to track your location in real-time. Along with location, you can use it to look back later at things like your elevation, distance and speed.

This isn’t the first app to offer this kind of functionality. Google Latitude offers auto-updating location features, and I’ve used a Garmin Forerunner 405 for a while to log my runs.

It seems that location-based apps like Foursquare are so ‘last week’ already. As Loic says, “why not just check in automatically if I accepted that the app does this for me”?

While it’s much easier to have an app that doesn’t need manually updating, the check-in system does offer its own benefits. One of the key ones is enhanced security.

There are likely times you just don’t want to broadcast your location. What’s more, you may also want to reduce the likelihood of some creepo finding out where you live because you forgot to turn the app off.

Setting my tin-foil hat aside, I think the reality is that this kind of feature will be fairly ubiquitous in a couple of years. Set that alongside the emergence of augmented reality applications, and we’re approaching a time when Minority Report-style advertising is a reality.

The question is will there eventually be a backlash to the erosion of personal privacy that this kind of application entails? Will concerns over this aspect prevent mainstream adoption of this kind of tool?

Merry Christmas!

The holiday season is upon us, complete with over-indulging, over-spending and (with any luck) a little over-celebrating. While the Thornley Fallis offices are open today, by the end of tomorrow I expect to have collapsed onto the couch, groaning at the sheer volume of food Caralin‘s mother has somehow forced into me.

CandlesFor many people this can be one of the happiest times of year. To others it can be one of the loneliest.

Wishing people a “merry Christmas” seems to have gone out of fashion in recent years as political correctness has set in. From my perspective, I’d be happy if someone wished me a happy Hanukkah, Kwanza or any other religion’s celebration.

So, I wish you a happy Christmas, and send my best to you and your loved ones, regardless of your religion and regardless of what you’re celebrating at this time of year.

Seven Reasons You Should Care About Disclosure on Twitter

A tweet from Eden Spodek caught my eye the other day:

“Am I in the minority in thinking consultants should disclose when tweeting about clients?”

DisclosureNow, I’ve written about disclosure plenty of times in the past, but given the recent introduction of disclosure rules by the FTC down in the US (check out Louis Gray’s fun post… is it just a matter of time until we have them in Canada?) and the growth of promotional postings on Twitter, it’s worth revisiting – especially in light of the new contributor function within Twitter.

From my perspective, I don’t think it matters if you’re being paid to talk about a client, if you’re just doing it yourself or even if you’re writing about a client’s competitor (a risky task). Either way, trust and relationships you’ve developed online are at play.

Here are seven reasons I think you should take those extra few keystrokes to disclose your client relationships:

  1. Undisclosed posts can be revealed – nothing is secret on the web.
  2. Social media is all about trust (it’s why Technorati did so well for so long (authority rankings) and why Google is doing well now). Failing to disclose your bias can contribute to losing trust.
  3. Most clients (Kanye excepted) won’t thank you for stirring-up controversy.
  4. Every string of characters you post can either build or damage your reputation. Which would you prefer?
  5. Your reputation is worth more than eight keystrokes – “(client)”.
  6. The benefit you’ll get from better conversions may be negated by the people who complain about you – to regulators, to the media or to others online (and those groups may overlap).
  7. Content exists online over a long period time thanks to Google (all the more so if Twitter fixes its ridiculous two-week search limit). If rules around disclosure get tightened down the line, you’re better off safe than sorry.

Opinions often vary on this – what’s your take?

(Image credit: margolove on Flickr)

Six Ways To Silo-Bust Your Communications

We’re into “2010 prediction season, and there are plenty of social media buzzwords being thrown around.” “Real-time,” “location-based,” “convergence” and “augmented reality” are a few that stand out for me.

No silos

I’m going to throw a new one into the mix; one that has been my mantra for a while, and which (I think) should frame your communications strategies for 2010 – if it doesn’t already:

Integration.

Silos suck

If I’ve learned anything from the social media work we’ve been fortunate enough to be a part of this year, it’s that siloed communications strategies rarely work. What good is a Twitter account if no-one knows it’s there? What good are user-generated videos if no-one can share them? If a news release falls in the forest, does anyone hear?

As communicators, we know that message repetition is key to message retention. When it comes to social media – a long-term, relationship-based channel – you have a great opportunity to reach people repeatedly with whatever messages you’re sharing. That goes whether you’re trying to offer a new customer service channel, develop long-term loyalty, gain product feedback, promote new services or whatever your goal is.

Your life as a communicator becomes a lot easier when the public-facing elements of your organization – the public relations, marketing, advertising, IT (where IT handles the website), customer service and (perhaps) social media functions – are pointing in the same direction.

Reality kicks in

It makes intuitive sense, right? Unfortunately, it doesn’t always work that way. Almost daily, you can see important campaigns launched without support from other functions and all sorts of similar fragmentation of strategies and tactics which undermine the success of the sizable investment made in them.

It’s not always as easy as it sounds to break out of communications silos. Regardless of the size of your organization (or the nature of the agency relationship) there are likely politics and turf involved. Organizational silos layer on top of the communication silos. In an agency, it can be particularly hard to coordinate with other agencies who, frankly, may wish they were executing some of the work you’re doing. Still, you can be the player that takes the high road and makes the first move to reach out. If you don’t try, you’ll never know.

Here are six simple things you can do to begin to integrate your communications and bust out of your silos:

  • Where possible, invite people from other communications functions to be in the room when planning your year’s activities. At a minimum, ensure the different functions’ plans are shared.
  • Plan to coordinate your activities with those of other functions. If there’s a big ad push in Q1, for example, consider whether other functions should push hard then, too. If not, consider how you’ll try to compensate for the lower advertising activity at other times in the year.
  • Ensure you integrate your messaging with other functions. If there’s an ad campaign focused on a new product feature, it makes sense to use other channels too, rather than focusing on something else, right? Remember – repetition begets retention, and retention leads to results.
  • Schedule regular update meetings with your colleagues in other departments. If you’re on the agency side, try to meet or talk regularly with other agencies working with your clients. You’ll probably need client buy-in (or even pressure) to make this happen, but it’s worth it.
  • Next time you launch a contest, product feature or web property, consider well ahead of time whether it could be featured in email blasts, direct mail pieces, advertising creative, news release, speeches etc. Lobby the appropriate people to update your company’s website with links to all of your web properties, and ensure your websites and social media properties link back.
  • Do what you can to integrate measurement with other functions. If you’re driving traffic to your website, don’t measure click-throughs; measure conversions. If you’re trying to drive foot traffic to stores, see if you can measure that. Don’t limit your measurement to the first level of proxies on the way to your goal.

These are just six simple ways to begin to break out of silos in your communications. There are plenty more out there – what would you add to the list?


Are We Seeing A Growth In “McDonalds Marketing”?

Cheryl Andonian (aka Momblebee) suggested in a comment that Michael Arrington’s “McDonalds content” issue I wrote about yesterday goes beyond news and content, and affects marketing as a whole. She says:

“This “McDonalds” issue is larger than just news and content. It is affecting creative work as well. Talented and trained professional freelance writers, graphic designers and web designers are competing against a glut of low end slingers who will give businesses “creative” work for pennies.”

Essentially, she say we’re seeing an increase in “McDonalds marketers” who capitalize on their clients’ lack of knowledge of creative and strategy – people who hand over low-end work at low-end prices.

Still, haven’t we always had this? There have always been “marketers” (whatever their stripes) who hawk standard, low-investment tactics in place of carefully crafted strategies. My argument would normally be that people will see the results of these efforts for what they are and that “survival of the fittest” would enable the real professionals to prevail (despite my cynicism when it comes to “social media experts“). However, Cheryl seems to suggest that this trend is a growing problem.

I wonder:

  1. Has the recession of the last year or so increased companies’ price sensitivity to the point where they will go to the lowest bidder?
  2. Has the growth of easy-to-access social media tools enabled these McDonalds marketers to reach their target audiences more easily?
  3. Is this a trend you’ve seen too?

What’s your take?

McDonalds Content and Social Search

Fast food contentMichael Arrington wrote an interesting post recently about the ongoing evolution in the news business. Referring to “the end of hand crafted content” as he sees it, Arrington speculates that, just as “old media” complained about the emergence of “new media” such as TechCrunch, the “new media” will soon begin complaining about the next generation of media.

The story in brief

In Arrington’s view, this next generation of content producers isn’t an evolution of “news” – it’s a new generation of low-end SEO chasers:

“So what really scares me? It’s the rise of fast food content that will surely, over time, destroy the mom and pop operations that hand craft their content today. It’s the rise of cheap, disposable content on a mass scale, force fed to us by the portals and search engines.”

Referring to it as “a race to the bottom, Arrington refers to the content created by  these producers as “McDonalds content.” As he puts it:

“…get ready for it, because you’ll be reading McDonalds five times a day in the near future. My advice to content creators is more subtle. Figure out an even more disruptive way to win, or die.”

My thoughts

I have two primary thoughts on this…

1. McDonald’s content?

I give Arrington credit for his frank take on this. It was somewhat refreshing to see TechCrunch acknowledging that soon sites like theirs will be the ones complaining about disruption in their industry. It’s also refreshing to see a prediction other than the devolution of news content into the lowest common denominator based on being first to print on a story (which is the direction we’ve seen both old and new media take in recent years).

On the flip side, I’m amused that he doesn’t think TechCrunch is in the “McDonalds” category already. TechCrunch, Engadget and their ilk have made their names by being first to the punch, often at the expense of balance or accuracy, so there’s a certain element of “pot, meet kettle” here.

Of course there are differences, especially with one of the two types of new company in the market – the ones which chase search trends with masses of articles. They’re a different beast, but let’s not kid ourselves that the existing players don’t play that game too. Google “Tiger Woods TechCrunch” for example, and you’ll see what I mean.

2. The case for social search

If existing search engine technologies, and the industry that’s emerged around them, have reached the point where content creators can game the system with sub-par (read: low value) content, then we can really make the case that these existing technologies have reached their limit.

Perhaps the answer lies in the potential for social connections to contextualize and prioritize our search results. Joe Thornley wrote an interesting post the other day suggesting exactly that – that “search continues to be a blunt instrument” and that social search might be a solution to the problem.

It’s not a new concept – Google rolled-out social search in Google Labs a couple of months ago – but, if Arrington’s “McDonalds media” predictions come to pass, I wonder if consumers’ frustrations might lead to enough demand to bump social search up into the mainstream.

What do you think? Is there a real danger for the next generation of news to manifest itself in this way? Is social search a potential solution?

(Image: Shutterstock)

Book Review – Trust Agents

For the past little while I’ve been slowly working my way through Trust Agents: Using the Web to Build Influence, Improve Reputation, and Earn Trust, written by Julien Smith and Chris Brogan. I’ve now finished it so, without further ado, here’s my take on this New York Times bestseller.

Trust Agents

The Good

  • It’s needed – As Chris and Julien state in the book, there really is a “trust deficit” when it comes to businesses nowadays. People don’t trust advertising. Businesses have abused peoples’ trust to the point where many people are cynical about any business’ actions. Meanwhile, research continues to show that when people trust an organization, they are more likely to both speak highly of that organization and to act on that positive opinion. That’s where this book comes in.
  • Accessible - Brogan and Smith have an accessible, easy-to-read style which makes the book easy to consume. The book manages to speak to a low common denominator without being condescending, and there’s a wry sense of humour behind the writing which comes through occasionally.
  • Tool-agnostic – Trust Agents deliberately shies away from pointing at any tool or group of tools (beyond “the Internet”) as a “must-have” tool. Indeed, many of the tips they offer refer to real-world, offline actions, which is a refreshing change for a book largely drawing on the potential of social media. As such, this book is more of a business book than a technology or social media book.
  • Good examples – Whether it’s in the real-world examples cited in the book or in the background research (I know Julien is a voracious reader so it doesn’t surprise me), there are plenty of examples of work done by other people which either relates to the concepts in the book or demonstrates them.
  • Well-structured – Trust Agents is broken into eight relatively lengthy chapters, but is sufficiently well structured that the six primary concepts of the book are easy to remember and provide a decent framework for self-analysis and improvement.

The Not So Good

  • Familiar examples – Many of the examples in the book are familiar to me… but then again, I probably know them because they’re the best examples. So, expect to hear about Comcast, Dell, and Gary Vaynerchuk… lots of Gary Vaynerchuk.
  • Basic – You may read much of Trust Agents and wonder what the big deal is about the advice – much of it is common sense. The flip side, of course, is that for years now businesses have been ignoring the kind of advice that makes you think “well duh,” hence the demand for books like this.
  • Challenging for large businesses – I can see a lot of these techniques being very difficult for large businesses. Much of the book is more likely to be adopted by small businesses. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, though – more of a reflection on how far many large organizations have fallen over time, to the point where the idea of individuals becoming Trust Agents is anathema to how they work.
  • It’s not for you - I would agree with Christopher S. Penn – the people who most need this book likely aren’t the ones who would ever buy it. So, if you know someone like that, pick up a copy for them. If they have any sense, they’ll thank you for it.

The Take-Aways

The six principles of the book are simple enough concepts to absorb:

  • Make your own game – business model innovation. Learn from trial and error; experiment
  • Be “one of us” – be genuine, not a gate-crashing outsider
  • Archimedes effect – generate leverage from your successes
  • Agent zero – become the person at the centre of your network
  • Human artist – improve your interpersonal skills; empower other people to succeed
  • Build an army – work with your network to accomplish tasks

Simple… and effective.

Conclusion

Trust Agents is a refreshing change from many of the books I’ve read recently. Like Mitch Joel’s Six Pixels of Separation, it’s not targeted at those of us already in the social media space – Brogan and Smith clearly note that they hope to reach a completely new group of people with this book. However, just like the former, it’s an enjoyable read for those of us who may already know (at least implicitly) much of the content within.

For people new to social media and its effects on communication and business strategy, this is an extremely valuable read.

Highly recommended.