Archive for 2010

HOW TO: Read 26 Books A Year

Late in 2009, Julien Smith’s fantastic approach to reading inspired me to set an ambitious target for this year: to read one book every two weeks throughout the year. I even published my target list of books so people could hold me to account.

Well, the year is almost up and despite a crazy year, I’m happy to say I hit my goal. In fact, I’m on my 28th book of 2010.

Why you should try it

Implementing a structured approach to reading can be extremely rewarding. It can be tough to keep up with the daily schedule, but the rewards far exceed the effort.

Reading this many books will let you:

  • Expand your worldview by reading beyond your normal topics
  • Learn new skills and make you better at your job
  • Become more interesting – you’ll have more things to talk about
  • Come up with new ideas

On top of that, I found that this year was the year I’ve finally started to work through a whole bunch of books that I should have read a long time ago.

I thoroughly recommend trying this approach.

26 books per year… how?

How do you go about reading a book every two weeks, all year?

It’s simple – 20 pages per day.

That equates to 140 pages per week, or 280 every two weeks – roughly the length of the average book. For me, I fit in 10 pages on my commute to work, and another 10 on the way home. You might prefer instead to read for 30 minutes in the evenings, or do all your reading over coffee in the morning. Either way, once you break it down like this, it’s not so bad.

What to read?

I started 2010 with a list of books I aimed to read, but the beauty of this kind of project is its flexibility and the list changed substantially throughout the year. Here are the books I read in 2010 (Amazon links are affiliate links):

Non-Fiction

  1. Feeding Frenzy by John Harmon — read my review here
  2. The Whuffie Factor: Using the Power of Social Networks to Build Your Business by Tara Hunt
  3. Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us by Daniel Pink
  4. The Fall Of Advertising And The Rise Of PR by Al Ries & Laura Ries
  5. Influence: The Psychology Of Persuasion, by Robert Cialdini
  6. Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard by Chip Heath and Dan Heath — read my review here
  7. Engage: The Complete Guide for Brands and Businesses to Build, Cultivate, and Measure Success in the New Web by Brian Solis — read my review here
  8. Delivering Happiness: A Path to Profits, Passion, and Purpose by Tony Hsieh
  9. Persuasion: The art of influencing people by James Borg — read my review here
  10. Sh*t My Dad Says by Justin Halpern
  11. When the Headline Is You: An Insider’s Guide to Handling the Media by Jeff Ansell
  12. Accidental Genius: Using Writing to Generate Your Best Ideas, Insight, and Content by Mark Levy –read my review here
  13. UnMarketing: Stop Marketing. Start Engaging. by Scott Stratten — read my review here
  14. Yes!: 50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be Persuasive by Robert Cialdini and Noah Goldstein
  15. The NOW Revolution: 7 Shifts to Make Your Business Faster, Smarter and More Social
  16. The Communicators: Leadership in a Crisis by Richard Levick and Charlie Slack
  17. All Employees are Marketers by Richard Parkes Cordock
  18. Reading now: They Fight Like Soldiers, They Die Like Children: The Global Quest to Eradicate the Use of Child Soldiers by Romeo Dallaire

Fiction

  1. 1984by George Orwell
  2. The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde
  3. Historical Tweets: The Completely Unabridged and Ridiculously Brief History of the World by Alan Beard and Alec McNayr – read my review here
  4. Wintersmith by Terry Pratchett
  5. Black Order by James Rollins
  6. Where Are You Now? by Mary Higgins Clarke
  7. The Templar Legacy by Steve Berry
  8. Deception Point by Dan Brown
  9. The High Road by Terry Fallis
  10. Cross Fire by James Patterson

Looking ahead to 2011

The other day I asked my Twitter friends what I should read in 2011. I’ll post those suggestions in an upcoming post soon.

Which books would you suggest I put on that list?

5 Ways to Digitize Santa

It’s nearly time for Santa to round up those reindeer and hit the skies for another round of gift-giving.

A couple of years ago, in the spirit of the season, I put out some suggestions on how Santa could fix-up his PR. This year, I got to thinking what I’d do to digitize Santa.

1. @Santa

Santa already has a Twitter account – @Santa. However, it’s dormant most of the year. Dial-up the activity throughout the year and keep that Christmas spirit alive. Oh, and get a decent Twitter background!

2. SantaBook

Santa also has a Facebook page, with a reasonable number of fans (nearly 17,000). However, he’s clearly not optimizing it given the number of potential fans out there. A few suggestions:

  • Custom landing tab: Santa’s elves need to convert all the people searching for him into fans. Right now his landing tab is the info page. Buddy, we know who you are. Find a way to get people to “like” you – maybe an extra present in your stocking, or the ability to use what’s next…
  • Claim that URL: He may have the Facebook.com/Santa URL, but this guy ain’t Santa. The real deal is losing traffic and fans when people search for him because of this. Get in touch with Facebook and contest it.
  • Christmas list application: Snail mail is so 1990! Time to dial-up the digital a bit. Given that the kids, we hear, aren’t even sending email now, Santa should consider creating an application that enables people to submit their Christmas lists via Facebook. Add sharing functionality to let them spread the word (make the most of those newsfeeds!)
  • Naughty/Nice application: Making a naughty/nice decision at the end of the year is a bit like doing an annual review for someone at the end of the year without giving them any feedback throughout. Not cool. Instead, why not offer an app to let kids connect their Facebook account and see where they sit on the scale at any point during the year.

3. Augment Santa’s reality

As the Earth’s population inches ever further up, that naughty/nice list must be getting hard to manage. Santa would benefit from an AR app (like this) that could recognize kids’ faces and determine which of the lists they’re on. Even better, recognize the houses they’re in so Santa can know whether to even land the sleigh on their roof or not.

4. Blog.Santa.com

Santa needs a property he owns that he can drive people to. Santa.com is parked right now; it’s the logical choice for a domain. As part of that hub, Santa (and his elves, if he’s pressed for time) could blog about the whole process of getting ready for the holidays. Think “Elf” but spread throughout the year. Talk about a must-read!

5. Protect Santa’s online identity

Don’t let people like this guy hijack your name (local Santas?! That’ll never catch on ;) )! Santa should claim his identity widely on social networks to safeguard his reputation.

Bad Idea: Location, location, Rudolph

Picture this: Santa checks into kid’s house on Foursquare. Kid gets notification. Kid comes down and catches Santa in the act. Then, the next morning, family wakes up and finds that Santa is the mayor of their house. Not cool.

What else?

A New Approach

A large part of what we do for many digital clients involves managing content and community for their online properties. However, in this case the cobbler’s son (my blog) has gotten to the point where he has no shoes.

For the last several years, I’ve focused on writing long-form content for this site. Each post that I’ve written has generally taken me between one and three hours to write, as I prefer to share in-depth, thought-out ideas that either provoke new thoughts or provide useful input.

Times, however, are a-changing. Caralin and I have recently bought and are in the process of renovating our first house; we’re planning our wedding and I’m working and traveling as much as ever. Set alongside all of these priorities, the time I’ve been able to spend on this site has suffered as I’ve found it difficult to find the time to flesh-out long-form content on a regular basis. As a result, a lot of ideas I have go unposted – not because I’m no longer having them, but because I don’t have the time to build them out in full.

So, I’m beginning a new approach to content, continuing the process I began with my Tumblr blog. I’ll be producing a mixture of long-form and short-form content; of the same kind of posts I’ve always posted and shorter thoughts, snippets and pointers to other interesting content. I will continue to prioritize long-form content when I can, but when time is short I’m going to prioritize thought-starters ahead of rounded-out posts.

I’m hoping that this will re-invigorate my site, without negatively affecting the content. The volume of longer posts will remain as it is now, but I’ll fill the gaps between them with regular shorter snippets. So, expect more questions and more speculative thoughts, and more points for discussion along the way.

I know I’m not the first person to struggle with this dilemma. Have you encountered this problem? How have you addressed it?

Don’t Put All Your Social Media Eggs In One Basket

So, a rumour says that Yahoo is  shutting down Deliciousor not. Cue a mass exodus as many people, including myself, look for ways to back-up thousands of bookmarks they’ve saved over the years. They also look to backup their photos on Flickr, as people realize that site may not be a sure thing after all.

Meanwhile, Facebook rolls out revamped Page layouts for brands… and then rolls them back, after first taking their site down for a while.

Both of these situations in the last week illustrate one thing:

It’s risky to put all of your eggs in one basket, especially if you don’t own that basket.

Not surprisingly, when the new Page layouts briefly launched last week, the first reaction of many of my surprised colleagues and developer friends was something along the lines of “oh, crap.”

Why?

Because this is one of the busiest times of year for many brands. Because many companies have campaigns in market over the run-up to the holidays, and any change in layout or functionality runs the risk of breaking or severely hindering the effectiveness of those promotions.

Many people seemed to share the sentiment of my friend Jeremy Wright, who tweeted:

FB has a fundamental responsibility to not disrupt their platform the week before Xmas.

I don’t blame him – companies are sinking big money into Facebook nowadays. It’s not just a free tool – it’s a key part of marketing activities for many brands (and has long since ceased to be free for many given application development and media buy costs).

These two situations serve to reinforce a point I often make nowadays:

Third-party social media tools have many advantages. However, you don’t own them. You don’t own the posts on them; you don’t own the design, the layout or the functionality; you don’t own the data held by them. In short, you don’t control them.

That’s why you shouldn’t throw all of your social media eggs into someone else’s basket.

So:

  • Spread it around. If resources permit, incorporate multiple sites into your approach. Integrate.
  • Own your hub. David Armano says that 2010 was the year that you went where the people were; 2011 will be the year where social functionality makes websites fashionable once again. Create your own social hub and control it. Control the design; control the paths you point people down; control the data; control the functionality.
  • Use third-party sites, but be conscious that they might not always be around… or keep their rules the same. If your site relies exclusively on Facebook’s Open Graph for sign-ins, for example, then Facebook going down must be pretty traumatic.

(Image: Shutterstock)

Are You Ready If Wikileaks Targets You?

Wikileaks creator Julian Assange has announced that his site is now going to begin to focus on businesses. Apparently the first target, early next year, will be a major American bank. Is your company ready to handle the crisis if an organization like Wikileaks decides to focus its attention on you?

The list of organizations getting blindsided by online attacks is growing ever longer. DKNY joined their ranks recently, thanks to PETANestle will be a case study of how not to respond for a long time thanks to Greenpeace; and the Cooks Source magazine got completely derailed when their misdoings were uncovered and detailed online.

Do you know how you’d respond in these kinds of situations, let alone if thousands of internal documents were revealed by an organization like Wikileaks?

If your answer is “no,” here are a few pointers

Dust off your crisis communications plan

Unearth your crisis communications plan. Does it include a digital component? If it doesn’t, find the appropriate people within your organization and work with them to update it.

Assume it’s coming

Organizations should assume that digital properties they manage, whether on-domain or off-domain, will get attacked by third parties. Every marketing initiative should, at a minimum, incorporate escalation processes into their plans. Community managers (whether internal or agency side) should be equipped with appropriate training and resources to respond to a situation should it occur… because one day, it might. As DKNY found out recently, these attacks can come from out of nowhere.

Plan and practice for scenarios

Pull people from multiple departments together and consider the most likely issues that might emerge, then practice responding to them. Use facilitators to establish scenarios, and drill your response team so that, when an issue occurs, people know how to respond.

The ostrich approach doesn’t work

As David Armano points out, shutting your online properties down just isn’t an appropriate response to an issue. Sticking your head in the sand (the ostrich approach) won’t make a serious issue go away and it doesn’t mean other people won’ t see the controversy; it just means you won’t see it.

Don’t be dumb

As I noted in the case of Cooks Source, communications can’t save you if you’re doing the wrong thing. Wikileaks, Greenpeace and PETA go after organizations they see as doing wrong. There’s no way you can please everyone and you shouldn’t run your company in constant fear, but you can avoid making yourself a target of these kinds of attacks by not doing dumb things.

What else would you add?

Why Paying Bloggers For Posts Changes The Game

There’s been a lot of debate back and forth around bloggers (generally mommy bloggers, although they’re certainly not the only ones) receiving direct payment for posts over the last little while. The latest post to catch my eye was a controversial piece over at Mom Blog Magazine entitled Why PR People Get Paid And You Don’t.

I’ve shied away from this topic in the past, but after some interesting conversations I’ve had over the last few weeks I’m ready to weigh in.

A quick note up-front: I’ve been writing here for six years now. Over that time I’ve built this site up from a static site, that I coded by hand in Notepad, to a blog with 40,000 views each month.

While I’ve never accepted monetary payment for posting, I generally get several requests to incorporate ads each week. I get the attraction – it’s a lot of work to maintain a blog – and I don’t begrudge anyone from monetizing their site.

With that out of the way, on to the crux of the matter…

To put it simply, bloggers accepting (or demanding) payment for posts changes the game for them in several ways:

  • You shift from earned to paid media
  • You shift from content creator to service provider
  • You need to compete for budget

Let me explain further…

You shift from earned to paid media

If we break online communications into different spheres – owned, paid, earned and social media – PR has traditionally played in the “earned media” space. When PR people pitch a journalist on a story, we’re trying to “earn” that coverage.

Earned media brings with it lots of advantages. It’s highly credible, it’s long-term (it lives on) and it increasingly plays a role in product sales. On the flip side, though, earned media is near-impossible to control – in terms of quantity of coverage, of tone of the journalist/blogger’s coverage or of the content of the coverage. However, the benefits have traditionally outweighed the risks (hence PR people have jobs).

To journalists/bloggers, that means that when a PR person approaches them, they have control of how they react to the ask. They can turn it down entirely and write nothing, or they can write a positive, neutral or even negative piece if they so choose. That’s fine, because they’re producing editorial content. PR people accept that risk when they pitch.

When money exchanges hands, the situation changes. Suddenly you’re no longer playing in the “earned media” space. Now you’re in the “paid media” space. That changes the expectations. If brands pay for placement, they have different expectations to when they just pitch for coverage. Not only do they expect the post to appear, but they also have different expectations around control of content.

Update: Paid media also suffers from a draw-back of being less trusted than earned coverage. (thanks to Jen Zingsheim for noting this in the comments)

It’s not a black-and-white situation in reality – mainstream media is now adopting more of a pay-for-play model – however, brands do get control over key messages within those stories.

Simply put: you earn coverage; you pay for ads. You can’t have things both ways. If you accept payment, expect different conditions.

Your role in the situation changes

The earned/paid distinction also plays into the second of the key factors in this debate.

On the earned media side, the PR person is looking for a win-win situation – they’re looking to win through favourable coverage; meanwhile they’re looking to provide value to the blogger through content opportunities that fit their needs (so they’ll publish not just this time but also down the road).

Once we’re dealing in the paid media space, the situation changes. Suddenly, you’re not just the recipient of a pitch, who gets to decide what to do. You’re a person who wants payment to provide a service. That means you need to demonstrate value to the party that’s looking to purchase that service.

This means a shift in roles. The PR person becomes a client, just as someone buying ad space is a client of the publication selling the ads. Meanwhile, you (now as a service provider) have more of an obligation around quality.

This leads into the last key factor here…

You need to compete for budget

When companies allocate marketing budgets to PR, advertising, interactive and social programs, they make a decision on how to allocate those resources to get the best results.

When PR agencies come up with their plans, they consider how to get the best results for the budget they have. Sometimes that will incorporate a blogger outreach program. They make the decision that this is the best use of their budget.

When bloggers require payment in order to write a post, they add another decision point in the budgeting process. That isn’t, by itself, an issue. However, the result is that the blogger then finds themselves competing against other options for budget.

That’s right – you’re competing for budget. That competition means:

  • You need to demonstrate your value, and “well you want my coverage so I’m valuable” isn’t an appropriate response.
  • Your asking price needs to be based in reality – on the value you can provide. How can you demonstrate your influence? Again, on the earned side the PR pro needs to do that research to satisfy the client; once you become paid media the onus is also on you.
  • You’re up against paid media with established CPM and/or CPC figures, with stated audiences and at least a ball-park number of impressions an advertiser can expect.

Again, is this bad? No. The reality, though, is that when you ask for money for your service, that needs to come at the expense of something else. Your value is therefore going to get compared to other investments. This can be a tough dose of reality for some bloggers, especially those with small audiences, who are used to getting the VIP treatment from brands.

Payment changes the situation

The bottom line here is that, when you ask for payment in order to write a post, the situation changes. You’re no longer just a blogger/journalist from whom a company is seeking earned coverage. You’re  a media property from whom they’re buying coverage.

Bloggers who decide to go this route need to understand that this is the situation. There’s nothing wrong with seeking to monetize your site, but if you’re not ready to deal with this reality then you could be in for a cold, harsh wake-up call.

There are plenty of different sides to this, of course. What do you think?

When your Customers Become an Issue

All my life I aspired to own a particular car brand. Where I grew up, there weren’t many around (it wasn’t the most affluent area) and I’d always loved the way they looked. So, I set my sights on owning one.

Now that I’m in a position where I’m considering which car to get, I no longer want that brand. Why? Not because the quality of the cars has changed – I still like them.

I don’t want that brand because of the other people who drive them. Whenever I get tailgated, it seems to be someone in one. Whenever I get cut up, it seems to be by someone in one (ok, a slight exaggeration, but it’s a very noticeable trend). I also frequently see drivers of that brand weaving aggressively in and out of traffic.

How does a company respond when its own customers, not its products or services, become an issue?

My thoughts: The solution certainly isn’t a purely branding-based program. Ads aren’t going to convince me – I might see an ad showing someone driving responsibly, but every time I’m out on the road I’ll see evidence to the contrary.

My initial inclination would be through a concerted effort to change the behaviour of customers through ongoing education – research to highlight peoples’ perceptions of irresponsible drivers; ongoing safe driving information for customers; partnerships with insurance companies etc.

What do you think?

9 Criteria For Selecting A Social Media Agency

A couple of years ago, I wrote a post about 8 factors to consider when selecting a “social media expert.” Looking back now, I can see how my approach has evolved and matured since then. What’s more, as I’ve spent more time on the consulting side, my focus has shifted from self-identified “experts” to agencies.

Chris Kieff wrote a post last week giving his thoughts on some numbers-focused ways to select a social media consultant. Personally, I think the list was much too focused on superficial numbers at the expense of useful depth (I have fewer than 1,000 Facebook friends and too small an ego for my own fan page so, according to his criteria, I’m not a good consultant).

So, without further ado, here are nine ways to evaluate a social media agency.

Strategic approach

Flashy contests and big-hit ideas are attractive to companies, for sure. However, all too often they do absolutely nothing to move the needle on companies’ objectives. So, while there’s nothing wrong with creative ideas (more on that shortly), they absolutely need to be paired with a strategic approach that takes into account the nuances of your situation. That means considering objectives, stakeholders, your key audiences, other overarching strategic considerations and appropriate metrics alongside the tactical ideas.

How to assess: Look for depth of thinking and how that ties back to your broader situation, rather than just for the ‘big idea’.

Long-term thinking

Campaigns can work, but starting from scratch for each campaign limits the potential effectiveness of those campaigns and runs the risk of generating social media scorched earth. Look for agencies with a long-term approach – with thoughts on how they’re going to generate ongoing engagement with fans you acquire; with ideas for how to maintain attention between your larger spikes in activity.

Good agencies are thinking outside the campaign box, and towards longer-term brand building, reputation building, issues management and relationship-building approaches. Demand these elements in any ideas your prospective agencies bring forward.

How to assess: Look for proposals that focus on long-term growth rather than (or in addition to) short-term benefits.

Integration

I’ve written many, many times about the importance of integrating social media with other communications channels. Operating in a silo goes against the reality – that there are significant overlaps between disciplines nowadays.

Good agencies should be able to (with the help of other agencies, if necessary) formulate, propose and, if necessary, work with your other agencies to execute an integrated plan that pulls together multiple media – earned, paid, owned and social.

How to assess: Look for ideas  that blend the strengths of different media forms when assessing proposals.

Working well with other agencies

Good agencies will not only provide a way to manage the inter-agency relationship, but provide examples of times they’ve worked productively with other agencies to achieve the best possible results from the client. Look for these examples and for their suggestions on how to work collaboratively with your other agencies.

How to assess: Make this part of your client reference checks.

Measurement

Does the agency have a point of view on how you should measure the activities they’re proposing? Assuming you’ve provided them with your business objectives, their activities should tie back into that. They should then tie their measurement through to those objectives.

Caveat: That measurement may involve seeing sales, website analytics or other internal measures from you. If you aren’t prepared to provide them, don’t be surprised if measurement suffers accordingly.

How to assess: Look for clear ties from objectives, to tactics, to measurement in proposed programs.

Case studies

Agencies should be able to provide concrete examples of work they have executed for other clients. While client confidentiality often means they may not be able to talk about it on their website, they should be able to muster solid examples, with solid approaches, execution, measurement and results.

How to assess: Ask for examples of prior work that are directly relevant to your challenges.

Ethical grounding

Difficult ethical issues abound in advanced social media use nowadays. Should you post that status update under your client’s name? Should you edit that wikipedia page? There are plenty of difficult issues that could get your company into trouble if handled improperly.

Whether you’re looking for an agency to help establish your social media foundation (employee policies, processes, etc) or to execute marketing programs, make sure your agency has navigated these issues before.

How to assess: Ask for examples of difficult ethical quandaries that your prospective agencies have navigated and ask about their approaches to specific conundrums.

Ability to break through the clutter

Let’s not kid ourselves – creativity is important. The digital landscape is becoming busier and busier, and companies need to find a way to break through the noise. That could be through a big creative idea; it could be through a differentiator such as improved customer service; it could be through other means. However you’re going to break through the clutter, it’s needed.

How to assess: Look for elements that make the agency’s ideas stand apart. However, don’t put all your focus on this at the expense of other factors.

Willingness to say “no”

Regardless of the type of company you work for, you need an agency partner that isn’t afraid to give you the best advice possible, even if you don’t always want to hear it. So, look for agencies who are prepared to tell you when an idea isn’t going to work, or when your suggestions may not be the best approach.

As the client, you’ll expect them to follow your ultimate decision, but until that point you need them to give you the best advice they can regardless of whether it matches with yours.

“Yes men” aren’t needed.

How to assess: If you like, you can use a scenario to assess this competency. However, you should certainly consider this when assessing agency performance over time.

What else?

I’m sure there are plenty of other ways to assess when selecting an agency. What would you add?

[Personal] Proud of my Brother

I usually keep this blog to work-based content, but I’m making an exception today.

My brother Simon lives with learning disabilities. Cornwall Council, which offers programs to help people in his situation find work, just produced this video about him.

I have a tear in my eye right now. I couldn’t be more proud of my little bro’.

5 Steps to Thinking More Socially About Communications

Like it or not, “digital” is becoming a part of more and more marketers’ jobs. The implications of this are broader than just tacking-on another channel to an existing marketing plan – developing digital approaches require a shift in mind-set from traditional channels, whether they’re owned, earned or paid.

Here are five ways to begin to shift your thinking from traditional communications to social communications.

Think “inbound” alongside “outbound”

Your new social hub, or your Facebook Page, or your engagement plan may be the nice, glamorous part of your approach to social media, but be careful not to completely neglect incoming information in favour of outbound messages.

Just as most companies invest resources in media monitoring, online monitoring should be a core component of any companies’ online activities nowadays. Social media is allowing more and more people to connect and talk about the things that they care about, and to do so in a place where you can hear them. This has three big implications:

  1. Self-identified audience – if people are talking about your company or brand, they’re doing the equivalent of raising their hand as people who care. It’s a marketer’s dream – in the past we’ve had to use a shotgun to do a rifle’s job. Nowadays, the rifle can work.
  2. Identify problems early – by monitoring what people are saying online, you can identify many issues in niche groups before they escalate to a broader audience. Because you can identify them, you can mitigate or prepare for the consequences and you can learn from them.
  3. Weather vane – monitoring lets you see the reactions to your activities in real-time, and to adjust them. So, if your approach isn’t resonating, or is being received negatively, you can adjust. This means that, rather than a fire-and-forget approach, or a ready-aim-aim-aim-aim-fire approach, you can adopt a ready-aim-fire-aim-fire-aim-fire approach that is more likely to generate good results.

Think long-term, not short-term

Social media outposts don’t come with a built-in, ready-to-go audience – you need to build your community over time. However, that’s not the way that many people have been taught to think. Marketing campaigns are often built around short-term microsites, campaign-focused landing pages and one-off ads.  That approach is ineffective in social media.

Launching a Facebook Page or Twitter account for a campaign then turning it off at the end of the campaign is akin, in traditional digital terms, to building an email list with a campaign then just deleting it once the campaign is done. It’s a waste. What’s more, you’re creating social media scorched earth as people who chose to connect with you may feel used.

Organizations often cited as leading the way in social media are launching properties and maintaining them over the long-term. The Starbucks Facebook Page, for example, has over 18 million fans. These didn’t just appear overnight (disclosure: Starbucks is an Edelman client). In comparison, the final episode of LOST drew 13.5 million people – five million fewer. While Starbucks isn’t a realistic comparison for most brands, the way they’ve built their fan base over the long-term is cause to stop and think about the “disposable property” approach.

Adjust your approach to measurement

Marketers and communicators have long suffered with poor measurement approaches based largely on guesswork. Online activities (first one-way, now two-way) let us draw a much more direct line back to our objectives… and we should take advantage of that.

In a world where social media activities are fighting for a piece of the same pie that everyone else is eating, we do need to demonstrate results. Yes, it’s frustrating that social media seems to be held to a higher measurement standard than other forms of communications, but it’s the newest and as such people aren’t yet sold on its effectiveness.

One big challenge right now is that traditional marketers are seeking to apply traditional metrics to this new paradigm. CPM metrics, for example, may make sense when you pay for the media and control every letter in your ad. However, when you’re dealing in earned media over which you have zero control of words, sentiment, audience or placement, not every eyeball is equal. Is it a good thing if Engadget posts a piece that rips your new product launch a new one? The CPM metric would say yes.  So, not every eyeball is even a good thing. Quality measures like sentiment, message and link inclusion and conversions for other goals become important.

Integrate your channels

The lines between communications disciplines have been blurring for some time now. Social media takes that to the next level. I wrote about the interplay between different forms of media late last year, and my colleague David Armano’s diagram of the intersection of these media types (below) illustrates it well.

Social media doesn’t fit into a neat silo. You’re operating with a mix of on-domain owned properties, outposts on third-party sites, engagement on other sites, paid ads and online earned media. This puts social media approaches at an uncomfortable intersection for people who would like to put “social” in its own bucket, or within an existing one.

That means your internal departments need to play nicely with each other. It means the agencies supporting you need to, too.

Get used to two-way conversations

Over the course of its history to-date, communications has evolved from one-to-one, to one-to-many, to many-to-many. Use of social media tools brings with it expectations. So, the question becomes not whether to respond, but how, because if you stick your head up, vomit your messages all over anyone who will listen, then disappear, you’re not going to convince anyone. You’ll end up with a bunch of people asking you questions with no response. If social media monitoring, as Marcel Lebrun says, is the equivalent of answering the social phone then not responding is like answering the phone then sitting on the line in silence.

When you publish new content, monitor regularly for reactions and respond to them. When you ask a question on Twitter, respond to people who reply. When you comment on a blog post, subscribe to the comment stream so you can see if anyone posts follow-up questions.

Two-way interaction is here to stay. The toothpaste isn’t going back in the tube. To ignore this is to put your head in the sand.

What else?

I’m sure these five shifts in thinking are just the tip of the iceberg. Do you agree? What else would you add?